On Thu, 2011-03-24 at 08:18 +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Ben Hutchings [2011-03-24 05:49]:
> > > For the first of these, we would need confirmation from upstream that it
> > > is suitable for backporting.
> >
> > Please decide whether you want to do this; if not then we should disable
> > X
* Ben Hutchings [2011-03-24 05:49]:
> > For the first of these, we would need confirmation from upstream that it
> > is suitable for backporting.
>
> Please decide whether you want to do this; if not then we should disable
> XFS on armel and hppa in squeeze.
I'm not planning to backport them.
--
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 22:07 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:42 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > This mail is about the XFS problems reported on ARM (which also affect
> > hppa and sh):
> >
> > * Andre Draszik [2010-05-27 11:41]:
> > > Not sure if you are the right person
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 20:42 +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> This mail is about the XFS problems reported on ARM (which also affect
> hppa and sh):
>
> * Andre Draszik [2010-05-27 11:41]:
> > Not sure if you are the right person to approach... Sorry if not :-)
> >
> > I was wondering (since you
This mail is about the XFS problems reported on ARM (which also affect
hppa and sh):
* Andre Draszik [2010-05-27 11:41]:
> Not sure if you are the right person to approach... Sorry if not :-)
>
> I was wondering (since you mention your debian kernel on your website)
> if you could update the deb
5 matches
Mail list logo
