Bug#423902: apt should use both md5 and sha1

2009-11-11 Thread Simon Paillard
On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 10:12:46PM +0200, Michael Vogt wrote: On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:20:18PM +0200, Thomas Geyer wrote: Package: apt Version: 0.6.46.4 Severity: wishlist Collisions for md5 and sha1 were found allready, so it's likely, that in the nearer future one of them alone

Bug#423902: apt should use both md5 and sha1

2007-06-09 Thread Daniel Burrows
Here's what I got with your message: On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 04:39:05PM -0400, Paul Check [EMAIL PROTECTED] was heard to say: Hey Mike: Sry to bother you..but what mailing list is this? I'd like to get off, but there are no unsubscribe directions in the message. I presume this is a list for

Bug#423902: apt should use both md5 and sha1

2007-06-08 Thread Colin Watson
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:20:18PM +0200, Thomas Geyer wrote: Package: apt Version: 0.6.46.4 Severity: wishlist Collisions for md5 and sha1 were found allready, so it's likely, that in the nearer future one of them alone won't be safe enough. Since it is harder to find collisions for

Bug#423902: apt should use both md5 and sha1

2007-06-08 Thread Michael Vogt
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:20:18PM +0200, Thomas Geyer wrote: Package: apt Version: 0.6.46.4 Severity: wishlist Collisions for md5 and sha1 were found allready, so it's likely, that in the nearer future one of them alone won't be safe enough. Since it is harder to find collisions for

Bug#423902: apt should use both md5 and sha1

2007-06-08 Thread Paul Check
Hey Mike: Sry to bother you..but what mailing list is this? I'd like to get off, but there are no unsubscribe directions in the message. I presume this is a list for apt, which I believe I joined a few months ago, but I didn't keep the unsubscribe instructions. Thx, Paul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#423902: apt should use both md5 and sha1

2007-05-14 Thread Thomas Geyer
Package: apt Version: 0.6.46.4 Severity: wishlist Collisions for md5 and sha1 were found allready, so it's likely, that in the nearer future one of them alone won't be safe enough. Since it is harder to find collisions for two checksums than for one, apt should use both of them at the same