Bug#424926: should it really recommend debconf-utils?

2008-01-24 Thread Steve Langasek
tags 424926 patch user 424926 [EMAIL PROTECTED] usertags 424926 ubuntu-patch hardy thanks Hi Manoj, There is tentative code in the debconf svn tree to support the x_loadtemplatefile extension, so I've gone ahead and prepared a patch that will let ucf use this with no need for

Bug#424926: should it really recommend debconf-utils?

2007-05-30 Thread Joey Hess
Manoj Srivastava wrote: The code in place to use debconf-loadtemplate was in response to a couple of bug reports, where debconf was used to install a package that used ucf but did not by itself use debconf; in a situation where the cache had been cleaned out. Since the package did

Bug#424926: should it really recommend debconf-utils?

2007-05-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, The code in place to use debconf-loadtemplate was in response to a couple of bug reports, where debconf was used to install a package that used ucf but did not by itself use debconf; in a situation where the cache had been cleaned out. Since the package did not use debconf; no

Bug#424926: should it really recommend debconf-utils?

2007-05-17 Thread Joey Hess
Package: ucf Version: 3.001 Severity: normal ucf recommends debconf-utils, for debconf-loadtemplate. It uses debconf-loadtemplate to load the ucf templates: # Load out templates, just in case our template has # not been loaded or the Debconf DB lost or corrupted # since