Bug#426310: closed by Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#426310: Info received (Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)))

2007-12-08 Thread Benoît Dejean
Le samedi 08 décembre 2007 à 19:24 +, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : A similar fix was merged upstream some time ago. Closing this bug. I'm blocking on 452367 so i (and ppc users) can't upgrade. AFAIR, this fix doesn't solve the memory leak. -- Benoît Dejean GNOME

Bug#426310: closed by Sjoerd Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Re: Bug#426310: Info received (Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)))

2007-12-08 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 09:37:51PM +0100, Benoît Dejean wrote: Le samedi 08 décembre 2007 à 19:24 +, Debian Bug Tracking System a écrit : A similar fix was merged upstream some time ago. Closing this bug. I'm blocking on 452367 so i (and ppc users) can't upgrade. AFAIR, this fix

Bug#426310: Info received (Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory))

2007-07-24 Thread Benoît Dejean
I have no idea at what i'm looking at, as valgrind does not report anything useful. So i'm giving a try to pmu.c as i run a ppc. I found two leaks in hald/linux/pmu.c:pmu_poll which is a timer function. The fix is trivial. As i don't know anything about the leak, i don't know how to reproduce

Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)

2007-07-23 Thread Benoît Dejean
Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 23:34 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : Benoît Dejean wrote: Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 23:15 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : Benoît Dejean wrote: It leaks a lot : it's now 30MB Is it the hald process directly or one of the addons? Which addons are enabled? Hi

Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)

2007-07-04 Thread Michael Biebl
Benoît Dejean wrote: Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 23:15 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : Benoît Dejean wrote: It leaks a lot : it's now 30MB Is it the hald process directly or one of the addons? Which addons are enabled? Hi Benoit, there were some memleak related fixes in the last uploads of hal.

Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)

2007-07-04 Thread Benoît Dejean
Le mercredi 04 juillet 2007 à 23:34 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : Benoît Dejean wrote: Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 23:15 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : Benoît Dejean wrote: It leaks a lot : it's now 30MB Is it the hald process directly or one of the addons? Which addons are enabled? Hi

Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)

2007-05-30 Thread Benoît Dejean
Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 23:15 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : Benoît Dejean wrote: It leaks a lot : it's now 30MB Is it the hald process directly or one of the addons? Which addons are enabled? You might try to run hald within valgrind to detect the memory leak. I can't reproduce the

Bug#426310: Info received (Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory))

2007-05-30 Thread Benoît Dejean
Here's a memcheck output. It misses a lot of debug symbols ... -- Benoît Dejean GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/ LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html hald.25559.bz2 Description: application/bzip signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)

2007-05-29 Thread Benoît Dejean
Le lundi 28 mai 2007 à 23:15 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit : Benoît Dejean wrote: It leaks a lot : it's now 30MB Is it the hald process directly or one of the addons? Which addons are enabled? /usr/sbin/hald hald-runner /usr/lib/hal/hald-addon-cpufreq hald-addon-keyboard:

Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)

2007-05-28 Thread Benoît Dejean
It leaks a lot : it's now 30MB -- Benoît Dejean GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/ LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html signature.asc Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée

Bug#426310: Acknowledgement (hal: leaks memory)

2007-05-28 Thread Michael Biebl
Benoît Dejean wrote: It leaks a lot : it's now 30MB Is it the hald process directly or one of the addons? Which addons are enabled? You might try to run hald within valgrind to detect the memory leak. I can't reproduce the problem (unfortunately). Michael -- Why is it that all of the