On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 12:06:00PM +0100, Micah Anderson wrote:
>
> Everything related to 127.0.0.1 works fine, *except* for ICMP, so what you
> are seeing is the normal behavior associated with vservers.
>
You are perfectly right! I don't have even think that it was only an
ICMP issue.
I per
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
But reassigning to the first assigned guest ip do not solve the problem...
I guess I dont understand what the problem is.
What exactly are you trying to accomplish?
I mean the second guest would like to see its guest to 127.0.0.1...
You can set multiple guests so
Everything related to 127.0.0.1 works fine, *except* for ICMP, so what you are
seeing is the normal behavior associated with vservers.
Micah
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Micah Anderson writes:
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
But reassigning to the first assigned guest ip do not solve the
problem..
Micah Anderson writes:
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
But reassigning to the first assigned guest ip do not solve the
problem...
I guess I dont understand what the problem is.
What exactly are you trying to accomplish?
I mean the second guest would like to see its guest to 127.0.0.1...
Y
Hi
But reassigning to the first assigned guest ip do not solve the problem...
I mean the second guest would like to see its guest to 127.0.0.1...
Or is the description wrong?
Regards,
// Ola
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 03:07:17PM +0100, Micah Anderson wrote:
>
>
> Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> >Hi
> >
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hi
Tanks a lot for the information.
Micah: Do you know why this option is not used in the Debian
vserver kernels?
Most likely Waldi would have the best answer to this question, but looking at
the configure information:
+config VSERVER_REMAP_SADDR
+ bool"Rem
Hi
Tanks a lot for the information.
Micah: Do you know why this option is not used in the Debian
vserver kernels?
Regards,
// Ola
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 11:34:29PM +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 07:41:56AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 03, 20
Hi
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:45:54PM +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:06:36PM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I thought that 127.0.0.1 actually referred to the local vserver and not
> > the mother host. Or am I mistaken here?
> >
>
> Well, i jus
Hi
I thought that 127.0.0.1 actually referred to the local vserver and not
the mother host. Or am I mistaken here?
Regards,
// Ola
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 01:31:54AM +0200, Sylvain Le Gall wrote:
> Package: vserver-debiantools
> Version: 0.3.4
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> Hello,
>
> When gener
Package: vserver-debiantools
Version: 0.3.4
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
When generating the hosts file, you should set localhost as an alias of
the real IP host. For me 127.0.0.1 is not accessible, so this line is
useless. Moreover, this seems to be a common practice in vserver!
Regards
Sylvain L
10 matches
Mail list logo
