tags 426939 wontfix
thanks
I'd rather improve the organization of the package (which it
definitely needs) than splitting it up. You see, it's not a large
package, it's just a bit disorganized. And that's the fault of
upstream (which is Ubuntu). Anyway, I want to avoid at all cost
that the
also sprach Bart Samwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.06.16.2209 +0100]:
don't kill me, instead split acpi-support into acpi-support-ibm,
acpi-support-toshiba, … please? :)
Sorry, I think I have to refuse this one (without killing you ;-) ).
There are various reasons for not wanting this:
Hi Martin,
martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bart Samwel [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.06.16.2209 +0100]:
don't kill me, instead split acpi-support into acpi-support-ibm,
acpi-support-toshiba, … please? :)
Sorry, I think I have to refuse this one (without killing you ;-) ).
There are various
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Bart Samwel wrote:
Well, it would allow me to use acpi-support and actually make sense
of /etc/acpid/* by removing all the stuff that I will never need.
This is Debian, after all...
I'd rather improve the organization of the package (which it definitely
needs) than
Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007, Bart Samwel wrote:
Well, it would allow me to use acpi-support and actually make sense
of /etc/acpid/* by removing all the stuff that I will never need.
This is Debian, after all...
I'd rather improve the organization of the package (which it
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Bart Samwel wrote:
All in all, I think these are enough reasons to not want this. If you
come up with a compelling case you can still change my mind of course,
but for now I'm considering this a wontfix.
FWIW, I agree.
Bart, BTW I receive the discussion on bug reports
Hi Martin,
don't kill me, instead split acpi-support into acpi-support-ibm,
acpi-support-toshiba, … please? :)
Sorry, I think I have to refuse this one (without killing you ;-) ).
There are various reasons for not wanting this:
* The acpi-support package is intended to contain a library
Package: acpi-support
Severity: wishlist
don't kill me, instead split acpi-support into acpi-support-ibm,
acpi-support-toshiba, … please? :)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1,
8 matches
Mail list logo
