tags #426980 confirmed pending
thanks
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 07:02:24PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > It is now ready. You theoretically need to Version-depend on
> > > "debconf >=1.4.69" but unless you intend to preserve backportability
> > > on sarge, this is not needed.
> >
> > I see
> I still feel that the message "please reconfigure exim4-config" is
> more a note than an error. I mean, nothing bad is happening, it is
> just that the package suggest something that might do what the user is
> intending to do.
I understand, this is really a though case.
My way to view things
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:54:22PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I still feel that the message "please reconfigure exim4-config" is
> > more a note than an error. I mean, nothing bad is happening, it is
> > just that the package suggest something that might do what the user is
> > intending t
> It is a very very uncritical error since no breakage occurred. I'd
> rather see the message as "informational". It is not even a warning.
Well, as said, this is anyway mor eyour call than mine, Marc. This has
no consequence on translations so, really, feel free to revert back to
note if you fee
Package: exim4
Version: N/A
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Debian maintainer,
On Sunday, May 13, 2007, I notified you of the beginning of a review process
concerning debconf templates for exim4.
The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates,
and the proposed changes a
> Package: exim4
> Version: N/A
> Severity: normal
> Tags: patch
>
> Dear Debian maintainer,
>
> On Sunday, May 13, 2007, I notified you of the beginning of a review process
> concerning debconf templates for exim4.
>
> The debian-l10n-english contributors have now reviewed these templates,
> an
> Please note that, unless you raise some objections to this rewrite, I
> will handle the updates directly in the SVN as I already manage l10n
> for exim4 (which is of course not the case for all packages which are
> reviewed by debian-l10n-english).
Last call for objections. :-)
Andreas, Marc,
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 07:44:18AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > Please note that, unless you raise some objections to this rewrite, I
> > will handle the updates directly in the SVN as I already manage l10n
> > for exim4 (which is of course not the case for all packages which are
> > reviewe
The changes suggested by you will be committed to exim's experimental
branch shortly.
I have the following comments:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 07:41:22AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Template: exim4/move_exim3_spool
> Type: boolean
> Default: false
> -_Description: Move undelivered mails fr
> > Template: exim4/move_exim3_spool
> > Type: boolean
> > Default: false
> > -_Description: Move undelivered mails from exim(v3) to exim4 spool?
> > - There are some undelivered mails in exim(v3) (or exim-tls(v3)) spool
> > +_Description: Move undelivered mails from Exim v3 to v4 spool?
> > + T
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 06:32:04PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > I do not like to suggest reverting to exim 3. exim 3 is gone.
> >
> > New wording:
> > This works only one-way: Exim4 can handle exim 3 spool but not
>
> s/exim 3/Exim 3 ?
Yes. Committed.
> > > Template: exim4-base/drec
>
> > It is now ready. You theoretically need to Version-depend on
> > "debconf >=1.4.69" but unless you intend to preserve backportability
> > on sarge, this is not needed.
>
> I see. Then the developer's reference needs updating.
>
> What exactly is the advantage of using error instead of note?
12 matches
Mail list logo
