> I've just had a look at the daily CVS snapshot of am-utils, and they
> will have fixed this properly in 6.1.6. They're fixing autoconf, as
> per your original suggestion, but a different way - not using the
> utsrelease header, but using Fedora's code, which changes it to use a
> different symbo
On 20 Jun 2007, at 4:45 pm, Jason Harrison wrote:
Well, of course those other two files are derived files, so the
acinclude file is actually the only one that needs modifying, as long
as I modify the rules file to rebuild the configure script by running
autoconf.
The linux-headers thing is goi
> Well, of course those other two files are derived files, so the
> acinclude file is actually the only one that needs modifying, as long
> as I modify the rules file to rebuild the configure script by running
> autoconf.
>
> The linux-headers thing is going to be a real headache. How do you
> bui
Turns out there's a simpler solution - adding a build-depends on
linux-kernel-headers. linux/version.h in that package still contains
the UTS_RELEASE symbol. No patch to acinclude required (at least,
not urgently - I'm still going to report this issue upstream though)
Tim
--
The Wellco
On 20 Jun 2007, at 12:38 am, Jason Harrison wrote:
Greetings,
I think this package also needs to now depend on one of the header
packages
that provides /usr/include/linux/utsrelease.h. In my case the
package that
enabled the package to build was linux-headers-2.6.21-1-k7.
I have also at
Greetings,
I think this package also needs to now depend on one of the header packages
that provides /usr/include/linux/utsrelease.h. In my case the package that
enabled the package to build was linux-headers-2.6.21-1-k7.
I have also attached another patch file. I discovered that several othe
> Er, have you attached the patch? Perhaps I'm being myopic but I
> can't see it...
>
> Tim
Greetings,
Yes I sent another email with the attachment. For some reason reportbug -A
am-utils-6.1.5.patch did not send the attachment. Not sure what went wrong.
Let me know if anything else is amiss.
Greetings,
Not sure why the attachment did not work. Anyways here it is again.
Regards,
Jason
--- acinclude.m4 2006-05-11 13:28:18.0 -0400
+++ acinclude.m4.new 2007-06-19 15:28:19.0 -0400
@@ -10158,6 +10158,7 @@
[
#include
#include
+#include
],
[
if (argc > 1)
@@ -10165,
On 19 Jun 2007, at 8:37 pm, Jason Harrison wrote:
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5
Followup-For: Bug #427260
Greetings,
I have attached a patch that seems to fix the problem. Please
review and if
acceptable apply.
Er, have you attached the patch? Perhaps I'm being myopic but I
can't
Package: am-utils
Version: 6.1.5
Followup-For: Bug #427260
Greetings,
I have attached a patch that seems to fix the problem. Please review and if
acceptable apply.
Regards,
Jason
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (900, 'testing')
Architecture:
10 matches
Mail list logo