> i have continued to defend the validity. the bug is obvious. the
> package is uninstallable. this is considered a show stopping /
> release critical bug.
>
What I'm not quite understanding is whether you think that a binary
module package must exist in the archive or you are unwilling to bu
reopen 428782
thanks
From: Filipus Klutiero
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:56:29 -0400
Subject: Invalid
You don't understand. The reason I'm closing this report is not that the
prebuilt nvidia 96xx packages are available in sid, but that your report is
invalid. There is no bu
reopen 428782
thanks
From: Filipus Klutiero
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 22:29:57 -0400
Subject: Close
The fact that there are no prebuilt nvidia 96xx LKM packages does not mean
that Debian decided not to distribute some...as shown by Randall's message.
that is not the point
> there are no nvdia-kernel-legacy-96xx-2.6.18-4-* packages.
>
Not yet, no. Maybe by Monday there will be if I get around to it.
Though they'll probably be for 9672 and 2.6.18-4.
--
Randall Donald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.khensu
reopen 428782
thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
reopen 428728
thanks
From: Filipus Klutiero
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 20:09:33 -0400
Subject: Close
> why not include pre-built binary packages for the legacy nvidia kernel
> driver as is done with the standard nvidia kernel driver?
If you're implying that Debian decided not t
reopen 428782
thanks
-- Forwarded message --
From: Filipus Klutiero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:22:37 -0400
Subject: Invalid
nvidia-kernel-legacy-96xx-1.0.9631 is a virtual package. It should be possible
to build an nvidia LKM package provi
7 matches
Mail list logo
