Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-18 Thread Florent Rougon
Sanjoy Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know it is deprecated? To help Debian ConTeXt users, because etch will be used for perhaps two years (and longer by people who then run it as 'oldstable'). OK. [...] Meanwhile I'll

Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-17 Thread Florent Rougon
Hi, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote: Installing 'lmodern' fixes the errors, because it provides those missing tfm files. So texlive-context should depend on lmodern, not merely recommend lmodern. Without lmodern, I think the package is totally unusable. texlive-context is an old package. In

Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-17 Thread Florent Rougon
Sanjoy Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know: I maintain Ubuntu edgy backports of the Debian unstable/Ubuntu gutsy packages for texlive 2007, including 'context'. So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know it is deprecated? apt-get is not a tool for newbies. If

Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-17 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
texlive-context is an old package. In unstable, it has been replaced by context, which depends on lmodern (= 1.01). I know: I maintain Ubuntu edgy backports of the Debian unstable/Ubuntu gutsy packages for texlive 2007, including 'context'. apt-get is not a tool for newbies. If you don't

Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-17 Thread Frank Küster
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sanjoy Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know: I maintain Ubuntu edgy backports of the Debian unstable/Ubuntu gutsy packages for texlive 2007, including 'context'. So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know it is

Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-17 Thread Florent Rougon
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know it is deprecated? Because context doesn't have the bug, but texlive-context has it. And I think it should be even serious. Okay, but texlive-context is dead, so this bug is nothing

Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-17 Thread Frank Küster
Florent Rougon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree. Putting lmodern in Recommends for context means: unless you know what you are doing, if you install context, then you also have to install lmodern. Consequently, if people follow this policy, they will always install lmodern alongside with

Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-17 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
So, why are you reporting a bug against texlive-context, since you know it is deprecated? To help Debian ConTeXt users, because etch will be used for perhaps two years (and longer by people who then run it as 'oldstable'). 2. Anyway, I fail to see what you want us to do, since the context

Bug#429314: texlive-context: missing dependency on lmodern

2007-06-16 Thread Sanjoy Mahajan
Package: texlive-context Version: 2005.dfsg.3-1 Severity: important This minimal test.tex ConTeXt example fails when run with 'texexec --pdf test.tex' (in Debian 'etch'): \starttext \input tufte \stoptext Here is the first error (the remainder are similar): kpathsea: Running mktextfm