Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2008-06-22 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
A new and working version was just committed to CVS by the upstream author Lorn Potter. I hope to get it uploaded in time for Lenny. JFYI. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2008-04-04 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Lucas Nussbaum] > Hi Petter, > > Any news on the gutenbrowser front? Nope, and I will soon give up. I've asked the upstream developer for a new release and news on this front 3-4 times, but no new tarball has materialized. It is a shame, as I would really like to have a working project guteboo

Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2008-04-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 29/11/07 at 20:12 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Lucas Nussbaum] > > Any news since a month ago? > > Yes. I got this reply from Lorn Potter today: > > > I haven't really worked on gutenbrowser lately, but I do have a (very > > basic) working version that uses qt 4. > > I will try to upd

Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2007-11-29 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Lucas Nussbaum] > Any news since a month ago? Yes. I got this reply from Lorn Potter today: > I haven't really worked on gutenbrowser lately, but I do have a (very > basic) working version that uses qt 4. > I will try to update the repository today or this weekend. I hope this new version will

Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2007-11-29 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 26/10/07 at 10:53 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Lucas Nussbaum] > > Any update on that? > > Nope. I've asked upstream a while back, but have not received any > feedback yet. > > > Since it has been useless for a long time now, maybe it's better to > > remove it now, and re-upload to un

Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2007-10-26 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Lucas Nussbaum] > Any update on that? Nope. I've asked upstream a while back, but have not received any feedback yet. > Since it has been useless for a long time now, maybe it's better to > remove it now, and re-upload to unstable when a fixed version is > available? I am beginning to lean to

Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2007-09-30 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 08/07/07 at 10:12 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I must admit, that because of my affection for the gutenberg project I > believe a package to provide easy access to the books are needed in > Debian, and I still hope a working package will show up from upstream > soon. I know he has bee

Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2007-07-08 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
I must admit, that because of my affection for the gutenberg project I believe a package to provide easy access to the books are needed in Debian, and I still hope a working package will show up from upstream soon. I know he has been working on it the last year. So I want to keep the package aro

Bug#429795: gutenbrowser: should this package be removed?

2007-06-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Package: gutenbrowser Version: 3:0.8.1-1 Severity: serious User: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Usertags: proposed-removal Hi, While reviewing packages that were not included in Etch, your package came up as a possible candidate for removal from Debian, because: * it doesn't work anymore, and it doesn't loo