Bug#209008: Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2008-03-16 Thread Russ Allbery
Lucas Nussbaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 05/03/08 at 08:45 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: >>> Okay, here's a revised proposal to address both Bug#209008 (parallel) and >>> Bug#430649 (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS parsing). This proposal does the following: >

Bug#209008: Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2008-03-05 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 05/03/08 at 08:45 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > > Okay, here's a revised proposal to address both Bug#209008 (parallel) and > > Bug#430649 (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS parsing). This proposal does the following: > [...] > > Comments? Seconds? > > Seconded.

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2008-03-04 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > Okay, here's a revised proposal to address both Bug#209008 (parallel) and > Bug#430649 (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS parsing). This proposal does the following: [...] > Comments? Seconds? Seconded. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour p

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2008-01-14 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Dec 31, 2007 at 11:30:25AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Lo?c Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Sun, Dec 30, 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > >> Comments? Seconds? > > > > Thanks for your wording! > > > >> +ifneq (,$(filter noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > >> +CFLAGS += -O0 > >> +else

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2008-01-07 Thread Russ Allbery
Guillem Jover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> +flag must consist only of lowercase letters >> +(a-z), numbers (0-9), and the characters >> +- and _ (hyphen and underscore). >> +options must not contain whitespace. The same >> +tag should not be given multipl

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2008-01-07 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi, On Sun, 2007-12-30 at 19:23:58 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote: > Okay, here's a revised proposal to address both Bug#209008 (parallel) and > Bug#430649 (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS parsing). This proposal does the following: > --- orig/policy.sgml > +++ mod/policy.sgml > + > + debian/rules and

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2007-12-31 Thread Russ Allbery
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Dec 30, 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: >> Comments? Seconds? > > Thanks for your wording! > >> +ifneq (,$(filter noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) >> +CFLAGS += -O0 >> +else >> +CFLAGS += -O2 >> +endif > > I personally use: > > CFLAGS += -Wall

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2007-12-31 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007, Russ Allbery wrote: > Comments? Seconds? Thanks for your wording! > +ifneq (,$(filter noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS))) > +CFLAGS += -O0 > +else > +CFLAGS += -O2 > +endif I personally use: CFLAGS += -Wall -g -O$(if $(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),0,2)

Bug#430649: New proposed wording for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

2007-12-30 Thread Russ Allbery
Okay, here's a revised proposal to address both Bug#209008 (parallel) and Bug#430649 (DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS parsing). This proposal does the following: * Standardizes on space as the separator for DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS. This only affects what people can pass into debian/rules, not any existing pa