Emanuele Rocca wrote:
XineramaIsActive()
The XineramaActive function returns a Boolean operator used to determine
if Xin‐
erama is activated on the screen. Returns True for active and False
for not
active.
(there's a typo, s/XineramaActive/XineramaIsActive/)
By
forwarded 432256 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11504
thank you
I have forwarded your bug upstream at the URL above. Feel free to add
some comments there if you think it could help.
Brice
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Package: libxinerama1
Version: 1:1.0.2-1
Severity: important
Hi,
according to XineramaIsActive(3):
XineramaIsActive()
The XineramaActive function returns a Boolean operator used to determine
if Xin‐
erama is activated on the screen. Returns True for active and False
for not
reassign 431746 xserver-xorg-core
forcemerge 431746 432256
thank you
Emanuele Rocca wrote:
Actually on my sparc machine XineramaIsActive() returns True, while
XineramaQueryScreens sets the number of screens to 0 and returns a NULL
pointer.
This bug makes gdm unusable, and probably other
Hi Brice,
* Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-07-08 23:01 +0200]:
Emanuele Rocca wrote:
Actually on my sparc machine XineramaIsActive() returns True, while
XineramaQueryScreens sets the number of screens to 0 and returns a NULL
pointer.
The exact same bug has been reported in
Emanuele Rocca wrote:
Uh! I checked only libxinerama's bugs before filing this one, sorry.
No problem.
Which xserver-xorg-core and drivers are you using on these machines?
xserver-xorg-core: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6
xserver-xorg-video-sunffb: 1:1.1.0-2
What about the i386 machine?
* Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED], [2007-07-08 23:45 +0200]:
Emanuele Rocca wrote:
xserver-xorg-core: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-6
xserver-xorg-video-sunffb: 1:1.1.0-2
What about the i386 machine?
xserver-xorg-core: 2:1.3.0.0.dfsg-7
xserver-xorg-video-ati: 1:6.6.3-2
I'm not much into X internals,
Emanuele Rocca wrote:
I'm not much into X internals, but after a quick grep for Xinerama on
-video-ati and -video-sunffb it seems to me that the latter doesn't
provide useful replies to Xinerama related requests like
X_XineramaIsActive, while the former does.
Indeed.
Somehow libxinerama
8 matches
Mail list logo
