On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 21:22:00 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> severity 432893 important
> thanks
>
> Le mercredi 29 août 2007 12:51, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > Hi Kurt,
> > > I don't necessarily think that this bug is not RC,
Le lundi 10 septembre 2007 07:19, Guillem Jover a écrit :
> On Wed, 2007-08-29 at 21:22:00 -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > severity 432893 important
> > thanks
> >
> > Le mercredi 29 août 2007 12:51, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Sep 2007, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> I don't see why I should not change the severity of a report against a
> package I'm not maintaining if the severity looks incorrect and the
> maintainance team didn't state anything about the severity. If you were
> basing that on something, plea
severity 432893 serious
thanks
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:42:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> > severity 432893 important
> Bug#432893: dpkg: Failed install follow
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> severity 432893 serious
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:42:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> > > severity 43
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> For the record, Philippe Cloutier alias Filipus Klutiero (and
> chealer on IRC) was already banned from the BTS control interface. I
> don't know if his ban has been lifted or if he uses another email.
> CCings BTS admins for info.
I removed the ban a
Le mercredi 29 août 2007 03:28, Kurt Roeckx a écrit :
> severity 432893 serious
> thanks
>
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 02:42:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.7
> > > sev
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:12:10AM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
>
> Hi Kurt,
> I don't necessarily think that this bug is not RC, I just assumed it wasn't.
> Severity was set to serious indirectly by the cloned bug's severity. While
> the severity against ghc seemed fine, I think it's unlikely
severity 432893 serious
thanks
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 09:22:00PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> OK. Nevertheless, I'm not convinced that this bug is release-critical, so I'm
> downgrading to important again. Do not upgrade the severity to serious again,
> as this bug is not a policy violation
9 matches
Mail list logo