Alasdair G Kergon writes ("Re: Bug#432986: lvm utilities complain about fds
>2"):
> Do you have any examples?
In sh, it is common to pass extra fds to subprocesses when doing fd
plumbing. For example, a debconf-using postinst ends up reexeced with
an fd onto the debconf
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:20:10PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> The lvm utilities apparently whinge if they inherit any fds other than
> 0,1,2. This is quite unreasonable. There is nothing wrong with
> executing a program with some inherited fd >2 and there are many
> reasons why one might want to
Package: lvm2
Version: 2.02.06-4
The lvm utilities apparently whinge if they inherit any fds other than
0,1,2. This is quite unreasonable. There is nothing wrong with
executing a program with some inherited fd >2 and there are many
reasons why one might want to do so.
If lvm needs to fork off a
3 matches
Mail list logo
