Bug#434172: dev=device should be optional in synopsis of wodim(1)

2007-08-06 Thread Reuben Thomas
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Peter Samuelson wrote: I think most users will not need dev=, ever. The common case, these days, is that you're running Linux 2.6 and you only have one CD-RW or DVD-RW drive in your system. wodim handles that case with no trouble. As a data point, I use -eject and -v all t

Bug#434172: dev=device should be optional in synopsis of wodim(1)

2007-08-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
[Reuben Thomas] > I think this is a particularly useful option, worth putting in the > synopsis, even if you don't put all the specific ones there: it's one > the user is very likely to use (as I did!). I think most users will not need dev=, ever. The common case, these days, is that you're runn

Bug#434172: dev=device should be optional in synopsis of wodim(1)

2007-08-06 Thread Reuben Thomas
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Peter Samuelson wrote: tags 434172 pending thanks [Reuben Thomas] The command-line argument "dev=device" is optional (wodim will look for a drive if you don't supply it), so it should be written "[dev=device]" in the man page. Or just omitted in the synopsis, just as we

Bug#434172: dev=device should be optional in synopsis of wodim(1)

2007-08-06 Thread Peter Samuelson
tags 434172 pending thanks [Reuben Thomas] > The command-line argument "dev=device" is optional (wodim will look for > a drive if you don't supply it), so it should be written "[dev=device]" > in the man page. Or just omitted in the synopsis, just as we omit all the other specific options. Done

Bug#434172: dev=device should be optional in synopsis of wodim(1)

2007-07-21 Thread Reuben Thomas
Package: wodim Version: 9:1.1.6-1 Severity: minor The command-line argument "dev=device" is optional (wodim will look for a drive if you don't supply it), so it should be written "[dev=device]" in the man page. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (