Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Joerg Schilling]
> > Please do not try to ignore reality. The user I was responding
> > was interested in cdrecord and not in a defective fork.
>
> Maybe you call it trying to convince our users to use your product
> instead; I call it spam. We don'
[Joerg Schilling]
> Please do not try to ignore reality. The user I was responding
> was interested in cdrecord and not in a defective fork.
Maybe you call it trying to convince our users to use your product
instead; I call it spam. We don't do it to your users. Please stop
doing it to our user
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [Joerg Schilling]
> > You cannot expect support from a dead fork that did never
> > do own code development.
>
> Please stop spamming our users and our bug tracking system. We don't
> advertise our efforts on _your_ support channels. Kindly do us th
[Joerg Schilling]
> You cannot expect support from a dead fork that did never
> do own code development.
Please stop spamming our users and our bug tracking system. We don't
advertise our efforts on _your_ support channels. Kindly do us the
same favor. Please just ignore us. If your theory is
Hi,
it seems that you are a victim of a missunderstanding.
You cannot expect support from a dead fork that did never
do own code development.
The official support mailing list for cdrecord is here:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
and BTW: cdrecord supports the the feature you are intereested for a
long tim
Hi,
I have done a quick hack test...
I downloaded & hacked the sources for the last version of cdrkit
(BTW it was ver. 2.01.01a31 by Jörg Schilling, not wodim ones) and
simply copied the audiomaster check from the "mmc_isyamaha" section
to the "mmc_isplextor" one, as for the following patch:
6 matches
Mail list logo
