For some reason, the following reply was rejected by the BTS. I'm including it for completeness.
----- Forwarded message from "A.D.F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----
From: "A.D.F." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gunnar Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Cherokee mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 19:29:46 +0000
Subject: Re: [Cherokee] The 'admin' plugin in 0.5.6 - Usable?
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE autolearn=no version=3.1.7-deb
Gunnar Wolf wrote:
>
> tags 434940 confirmed,upstream
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
> Cherokee developers: Please take a look at Debian bug report #434940:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434940
>
> Rafal complains that we are shipping
> /etc/cherokee/mods-available/admin, but whenever we link the file from
> /etc/cherokee/mods-enabled, Cherokee refuses to start:
>
> module_loader.c:226: ERROR: dlopen(/usr/lib/cherokee/libplugin_admin.so):
> /usr/lib/cherokee/libplugin_admin.so: cannot open shared object file: No such
> file or directory
> module_loader.c:378: ERROR: Can't open "admin" module
> ERROR: Loading module 'admin'
> Couldn't read the config file
>
> Now, of course, this is intentional, as in the package building
> session I held with Álvaro some years ago already, he asked me to
> include this in debian/rules:
>
> # FIX 6: This stuff is not ready to be used
> rm $(BUILD_DIR)/usr/lib/libcherokee-config*
> rm $(BUILD_DIR)/usr/lib/cherokee/libplugin_admin*
> rm $(BUILD_DIR)/usr/lib/cherokee/libplugin_fastcgi*
>
> It seems we only forgot to remove the reference from
> mods-available. Now, given this was made many years ago already:
> What's the status, as of 0.5.6, of the admin module? Should I remove
> the reference, or should I stop removing the files?
IMHO I would remove the reference and all the *admin* files too,
but of course this should be done by Alvaro.
Version 0.5.6 was released almost 8 months ago and
because everybody thought that the next release would have been 0.6.0,
nobody cared about open bugs, etc.
If people maintaining stable versions of Cherokee 0.5.5 or 0.5.6
would care to send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or (better)
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] their patches,
I guess that Alvaro could rethink about releasing
a stable 0.5.7 version (also because many people will not
switch to 0.6.0 until it is really ready (i.e. documentation,
administration interface, etc.) and so not before other 2 or 3 months.
I already backported to svn branch 0.5 a few fixes,
so if there is some interest for a 0.5.7 release,
I could backport many more from trunk.
Greetings.
--
Nick Name: A.D.F.
E-Mail: <adefacc () tin ! it>
E-Mail-Format: Plain Text only (please); view using font Courier New
--
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Gunnar Wolf - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - (+52-55)5623-0154 / 1451-2244
PGP key 1024D/8BB527AF 2001-10-23
Fingerprint: 0C79 D2D1 2C4E 9CE4 5973 F800 D80E F35A 8BB5 27AF
pgpedLu8weHVb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
