Bug#435204: mount now depends on nfs-common

2007-07-30 Thread Marco d'Itri
I agree with the other submitters, it's not appropriate for mount to force installing portmap and nfs-utils. They are not used on most systems and ~everybody will have to waste time learning how to disable them securely. -- ciao, Marco -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subje

Bug#435204: mount now depends on nfs-common

2007-07-30 Thread Aleksi Suhonen
Hello, I mostly use debian for servers. Name servers, smtp, http, etc. My main worry is security, and so I want to have as few pieces of software running on each server as possible. And I especially don't want to have any extra TCP or UDP ports listening for incoming attacks. Hence, I need my ser

Bug#435204: mount now depends on nfs-common

2007-07-29 Thread brian m. carlson
I concur with the sentiment that nfs-common is wholly unnecessary for most users. nfs-common brings in portmap, which makes three additional (and for me, unnecessary) services that are pulled in by an essential package. Additionally, mount is priority required and nfs-common is priority standard.