Rafael,
I would prefer the second option, because we don't distribute the
software any longer.
Maybe it is sufficient to replace the old license under the copyright
line in the C file with the standard LGPL header?We can use version
3 or higher of the LGPL, unless Octave has a different
whatever is easiest. i am happy with semidef_prog having either license.
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
* Lieven Vandenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 09:13]:
I can see why our license is ambiguous. When we wrote it in 1994, we
intended it to mean that the program is entirely free, fo
* Lieven Vandenberghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 09:13]:
> I can see why our license is ambiguous. When we wrote it in 1994, we
> intended it to mean that the program is entirely free, for any purpose
> (including commercial) and without any restriction.
>
> If it is easier if we swit
* Stephen Boyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-31 16:41]:
> i (and many others too) do most of my day to day convex optimization
> work using cvx, which has a GNU license, but unfortunately, runs on top
> of matlab. our plan (hope? goal?) however is to develop a full GNU
> system for modeling and
4 matches
Mail list logo
