On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:20:29PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:57:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
> >> > >> 4. Probably ld-linux.so itself shoul
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 10:15:58PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
> Well, your answer suggests there are other programs that are allowed to
> segfault. Is there a list of them so that I won't repeat mistake
> reporting their segfaults as bugs in the future? ;)
The C library is simply a special case.
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
>> >> 4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
>
>> Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the
>> program does start, but the (4) a
Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:57:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
>> > >> 4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
>>
>> > Thank you very much for clarificat
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 11:57:23AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
> > >> 4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
>
> > Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the
> > program d
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 07:25:23PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
> >> 4. Probably ld-linux.so itself should not segfault no matter what.
> Thank you very much for clarification. Yes, I did it wrong, and now the
> program does start, but the (4) above holds, right? Therefore I still
> think it's a b
Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:49:30PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
>> I don't believe it's OK to close this bug due to the following reasons:
>>
>> 1. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of gtk-1.2 libraries (when
>>application is linked agains
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:49:30PM +0400, Sergei Organov wrote:
> I don't believe it's OK to close this bug due to the following reasons:
>
> 1. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of gtk-1.2 libraries (when
>application is linked against gtk-1.2 instead of gtk-2.0).
>
> 2. It does work
I don't believe it's OK to close this bug due to the following reasons:
1. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of gtk-1.2 libraries (when
application is linked against gtk-1.2 instead of gtk-2.0).
2. It does work with /usr/lib/debug version of libc6 libraries.
3. Package description of l
Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.6.ds1-13
Severity: normal
File: /lib/ld-linux.so.2
When I try to debug a program using debugging version of gtk-2.0
libraries, I get segmentation fault from ld-linux.so at startup. When
using non-debugging version of the libraries, the program starts
normally.
When I s
10 matches
Mail list logo
