Bug#436060: New Upstream for libmtp (release 0.2.0)

2007-08-05 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-04 19:56]: Package: libmtp Version: 0.1.5-2 The fine folks over at the libmtp project have released a new version of libmtp, v0.2.0. From the notes to downstream: The library version is bumped to libmtp.so.6 as a consequence of the changes

Bug#436060: New Upstream for libmtp (release 0.2.0)

2007-08-05 Thread Loïc Minier
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: I am Cc:ing this message to the maintainers of the packages depending on libmtp (amarok, gnomad2, and rhythmbox), such that we can coordinate the transition. Should I fill separate bug reports against those packages? Is it 100% API compatible?

Bug#436060: New Upstream for libmtp (release 0.2.0)

2007-08-05 Thread Rafael Laboissiere
* Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-05 15:13]: On Sun, Aug 05, 2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: I am Cc:ing this message to the maintainers of the packages depending on libmtp (amarok, gnomad2, and rhythmbox), such that we can coordinate the transition. Should I fill separate bug

Bug#436060: New Upstream for libmtp (release 0.2.0)

2007-08-05 Thread Sean Kellogg
On Sunday 05 August 2007 06:13:17 am Loïc Minier wrote: On Sun, Aug 05, 2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: I am Cc:ing this message to the maintainers of the packages depending on libmtp (amarok, gnomad2, and rhythmbox), such that we can coordinate the transition. Should I fill separate bug

Bug#436060: New Upstream for libmtp (release 0.2.0)

2007-08-04 Thread Sean Kellogg
Package: libmtp Version: 0.1.5-2 The fine folks over at the libmtp project have released a new version of libmtp, v0.2.0. From the notes to downstream: The library version is bumped to libmtp.so.6 as a consequence of the changes which affects distribution packaging and makes it necessary to