* Sean Kellogg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-04 19:56]:
Package: libmtp
Version: 0.1.5-2
The fine folks over at the libmtp project have released a new version
of libmtp, v0.2.0.
From the notes to downstream:
The library version is bumped to libmtp.so.6 as a consequence of the
changes
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
I am Cc:ing this message to the maintainers of the packages depending on
libmtp (amarok, gnomad2, and rhythmbox), such that we can coordinate the
transition. Should I fill separate bug reports against those packages?
Is it 100% API compatible?
* Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-08-05 15:13]:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
I am Cc:ing this message to the maintainers of the packages depending on
libmtp (amarok, gnomad2, and rhythmbox), such that we can coordinate the
transition. Should I fill separate bug
On Sunday 05 August 2007 06:13:17 am Loïc Minier wrote:
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
I am Cc:ing this message to the maintainers of the packages
depending on libmtp (amarok, gnomad2, and rhythmbox), such that
we can coordinate the transition. Should I fill separate bug
Package: libmtp
Version: 0.1.5-2
The fine folks over at the libmtp project have released a new version
of libmtp, v0.2.0.
From the notes to downstream:
The library version is bumped to libmtp.so.6 as a consequence of the
changes which affects distribution packaging and makes it necessary
to
5 matches
Mail list logo
