I've tried the 2.6.25-trunk kernel, and the latest in sid and as of
today (2008-04-20) the only way I can transfer videos from my dv camera
to my hard disk is with Holger's kernels (the ones with the old firewire
stack enabled). I do not understand why the debian kernel maintainers
are so
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 01:02:18PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
I've tried the 2.6.25-trunk kernel, and the latest in sid and as of
today (2008-04-20) the only way I can transfer videos from my dv camera
to my hard disk is with Holger's kernels (the ones with the old firewire
stack enabled).
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:30:48PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
boaah as debian developer can you please send in a proper bug report.
open a new bug with all your hardware info dmesg, lspci.
used firewire userspace components.
No, not particularly at this point; I think there are plenty of
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Michael Stone wrote:
No, not particularly at this point; I think there are plenty of bug
reports indicating that the userspace components in debian don't support
juju well.
well that is quite a shame!?!
juju is been released on the third fedora release
for most
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:04:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Michael Stone wrote:
No, not particularly at this point; I think there are plenty of bug
reports indicating that the userspace components in debian don't support
juju well.
well that is quite a
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 11:04:31PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
for most userspace apps there exist working patches as documented
by post of libdc1394 maintainer.
That's irrelevant. There is manifestly a problem with video. It was
reported in August of last year. You can't credibly
Hi,
On Tuesday 12 February 2008 12:31, Guus Sliepen wrote:
I do not see why making the old stack available again, but blacklisted
by default, discourages testing of the newer stack. If you have both
available, then yes, users can switch to the new stack more easily, but
at least they will
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 06:05:20PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
even with 2.6.24-4 linux images?
please mention the uname of your tests
I'll see if I can do the tests on a clean install with the latest linux
images tomorrow.
uname:
Linux barebone1 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 13:47:43
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:27:29AM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Early March 2008
Very soft freeze
[...]
Mid of July 2008
Full freeze
I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
2.6.24.x.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:38:13PM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
My IIDC cameras do not work correctly with a juju-enabled libdc1394
2.0.1. Furthermore, apart from coriander there are no applications that
have migrated from libdc1394 v1 to v2.
even with 2.6.24-4 linux images?
please
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:49:22AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
2.6.24.x. If that is so, then I kindly request that the debian kernel
packages will be released with the stable Firewire stack modules
compiled.
no
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Early March 2008
Very soft freeze
[...]
Mid of July 2008
Full freeze
I guess that means that lenny will be released with linux kernel
2.6.24.x. If that is so, then I kindly request that the debian kernel
packages
[ stripping cc list to relevant bug report + devel for general info ]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:31:43PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:49:22AM +0100, maximilian attems wrote:
Given the pace of kernel releases, I do not believe 2.6.26 is possible
for lenny, but 2.6.25
13 matches
Mail list logo
