On Wed, Aug 08, 2007 at 08:37:46AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> Anyone fancy taking on glipper?
I would take it, considering that I used its predecessor. I am waiting
for upstream to provide licence clarifications through proper licence
headers and copyright statements.
The package I prepared wo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You can orphan the package, or make a request for help.
Neil Williams wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Glipper is currently my package in Debian at 0.95.1-3 and that version
> is written in C and uses a
Neil Williams ha scritto:
> It's an unusual situation - normally the previous DD is the ideal
> person to sponsor the new maintainer adopting the package. The problem
> here is that the new upstream version of glipper is a completely new
> application in nearly all relevant aspects. If there is an
On Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:10:01 +0200
Davide Truffa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to adopt the glipper package, I will glad to take care of it.
> I do have a reasonable amount of experience with python, even if I
> don't know very well the gnome packaging policy, yet.
Thanks!
> I'm
Hi,
I intend to adopt the glipper package, I will glad to take care of it.
I do have a reasonable amount of experience with python, even if I
don't know very well the gnome packaging policy, yet.
I'm not a DD.
If my usual sponsor is not interested, can I contact you?
Cheers,
--
Davide Truffa
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glipper is currently my package in Debian at 0.95.1-3 and that version
is written in C and uses a binary data file which has raised one bug
(#436078).
There is now a new release that closes this bug, my problem is that
v1.0 is a groun
6 matches
Mail list logo
