Marco d'Itri, le Sun 10 Aug 2008 01:30:14 +0200, a écrit :
> On Aug 10, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I wonder how debian will ever have a non-linux port with this kind of
> > approach.
> I suspect that they will first need to be useful for more than being
> toys for the develop
On Aug 10, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder how debian will ever have a non-linux port with this kind of
> approach.
I suspect that they will first need to be useful for more than being
toys for the developers working on them.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digi
Marco d'Itri, le Sun 10 Aug 2008 01:17:47 +0200, a écrit :
> On Aug 10, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just to make sure: are you aware that hal build-depends on
> > libvolume-id-dev, and thus not fixing this bugs means that hal will
> > FTBFS on all non-Linux ports?
> I will be int
On Aug 10, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to make sure: are you aware that hal build-depends on
> libvolume-id-dev, and thus not fixing this bugs means that hal will
> FTBFS on all non-Linux ports?
I will be interested in this the day the HAL maintainer will believe
this to be a
Just to make sure: are you aware that hal build-depends on
libvolume-id-dev, and thus not fixing this bugs means that hal will
FTBFS on all non-Linux ports?
Samuel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marco d'Itri, le Thu 07 Aug 2008 01:41:35 +0200, a écrit :
> On Aug 07, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > ?! I thought that when a bug is not to be resolved wontfix was supposed
> > to be used instead of closing it...
> If there is a point in keeping it around for documentation valu
On Aug 07, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ?! I thought that when a bug is not to be resolved wontfix was supposed
> to be used instead of closing it...
If there is a point in keeping it around for documentation value.
--
ciao,
Marco
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Marco d'Itri, le Fri 10 Aug 2007 22:09:01 +0200, a écrit :
> On Aug 10, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Udev currently only builds on linux platforms, while libvolume-id can be
> > useful for other platforms too. Here is a patch that makes it build
> Too much invasive. I am not i
On Aug 10, Samuel Thibault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Udev currently only builds on linux platforms, while libvolume-id can be
> useful for other platforms too. Here is a patch that makes it build
Too much invasive. I am not interested unless you can make it *much*
shorter.
--
ciao,
Marco
s
Package: udev
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
Udev currently only builds on linux platforms, while libvolume-id can be
useful for other platforms too. Here is a patch that makes it build
libvolume-id0 and libvolume-id-dev on non-linux archs, tested on i386
and hurd-i386.
Samuel
Samuel
diff -u
10 matches
Mail list logo
