Bug#438179: RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not apply

On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 09:52:51PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [071206 21:41]: Does this also apply to stable? The tech ctte didn't do a decision about stable, though it seems that most of us consider it appropriate. I think that you should explicitly

Bug#438179: RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not apply

reassign 438179 glibc thanks The Technical Committee has decided as follows: 1. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv4 addresses by Debian systems, and we DO overrule the maintainer. 2. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv6 addresses by Debian systems. We do NOT

Bug#438179: RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not apply

On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 08:11:51PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: reassign 438179 glibc thanks The Technical Committee has decided as follows: 1. RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not be applied to IPv4 addresses by Debian systems, and we DO overrule the maintainer. 2. RFC3484 s6 rule 9

Bug#438179: RFC3484 s6 rule 9 should not apply

* Aurelien Jarno ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [071206 21:41]: Please DON'T NMU the glibc, we will do the necessary in the next upload to unstable. Does this also apply to stable? The tech ctte didn't do a decision about stable, though it seems that most of us consider it appropriate. So I would prefer