On Fri, Dec 7, 2007 at 23:09:56 +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80c9581]
1: [0xe420]
2:
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libGLcore.so(_mesa_update_state_locked+0x7e1)
[0xb376af91]
3:
On Dec 7, 2007 2:10 AM, Lou Arruda wrote:
I did get the same backgrace in Xorg.0.log with the live CD as with a
regular boot of the hard drive. I also have an ATI Mobility Radeon
9600 M10 running in an IBM ThinkPad T42.
Can you please attach your log file? Preferably using the latest software.
Lou, thanks for the log files, which have this stack trace:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80c9581]
1: [0xe420]
2:
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libGLcore.so(_mesa_update_state_locked+0x7e1)
[0xb376af91]
3:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2007 at 23:09:56 +0100, Tormod Volden wrote:
Lou, thanks for the log files, which have this stack trace:
Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/X(xf86SigHandler+0x81) [0x80c9581]
1: [0xe420]
2:
/usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions//libGLcore.so(_mesa_update_state_locked+0x7e1)
I have confirmed that this bug is not linked to the proprietary fglrx drivers
as I was able to reproduce it via live CD.
Lou, do you get the same backtrace in Xorg.0.log? What kind of card do you have?
This seems more like a bug in mesa rather than in xscreensaver.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Dec 6, 2007 4:58 PM, Tormod Volden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have confirmed that this bug is not linked to the proprietary fglrx
drivers
as I was able to reproduce it via live CD.
Lou, do you get the same backtrace in Xorg.0.log? What kind of card do you
have?
This seems more like
I have confirmed that this bug is not linked to the proprietary fglrx drivers
as I was able to reproduce it via live CD.
--
http://www.techhouse.org/lou --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Searching for a distant star, heading off to
Dragonmaster Lou|
7 matches
Mail list logo
