-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 01:25:09PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>On Sunday 01 March 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> >OK. I ran into this because inn2 needs a recommends or suggests on
>> >libgd-gd2-(no)xpm-perl and was wondering if both variants should
>
On Sunday 01 March 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> >OK. I ran into this because inn2 needs a recommends or suggests on
> >libgd-gd2-(no)xpm-perl and was wondering if both variants should
> >provide a pseudo package (as the regular libs do) to make such a
> >dependency easier.
>
> I decided to not h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 12:26:05PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>On Sunday 01 March 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:34:39AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>> >Shouldn't this BR be tagged wontfix?
>>
>> Actually, no: I am no longer again
On Sunday 01 March 2009, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:34:39AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> >Shouldn't this BR be tagged wontfix?
>
> Actually, no: I am no longer against dropping the noxpm flavor.
OK. I ran into this because inn2 needs a recommends or suggests on
libgd-gd2-(n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:34:39AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>Shouldn't this BR be tagged wontfix?
Actually, no: I am no longer against dropping the noxpm flavor.
It is just a matter of time, and/or help...
Severity is fine too: nothing is broken (I b
Shouldn't this BR be tagged wontfix?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: libgd2
Severity: wishlist
Dear GD team,
Whatever I do, it always end up in a situation where aptitude asks me to
shift from -xpm or -noxpm when I install new packages depending on GD.
Is this dichotomy really needed ? If it is not anymore the case in 2007,
I wouldn't mind the dissapearin
7 matches
Mail list logo
