Bug#445500: Odd difference between cp -bf x x and cp -bf x .

2007-10-06 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 09:53:34PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: >> If not, I see no problem in closing this bug. > > Okay. Because this is not something that I think should be different > in Debian than in the upstream (not as a distro specific patch) I am > going to close the bug. No worries. > As

Bug#445500: Odd difference between cp -bf x x and cp -bf x .

2007-10-06 Thread Trent W. Buck
On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 10:34:07AM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: >> I don't think this is a bug, but I don't understand why only one >> (rather than both or none) of the following cp invocations fail: >> >> $ cp -bf x x >> $ cp -bf x ./ >> cp: `x' and `./x' are the same file > > A comment in

Bug#445500: Odd difference between cp -bf x x and cp -bf x .

2007-10-06 Thread Bob Proulx
Trent W. Buck wrote: > I don't think this is a bug, but I don't understand why only one > (rather than both or none) of the following cp invocations fail: > ... > $ cp -bf x x > $ ls > x x.~1~ > $ cp -bf x ./ > cp: `x' and `./x' are the same file A comment in the code probably

Bug#445500: Odd difference between cp -bf x x and cp -bf x .

2007-10-06 Thread Trent W. Buck
Package: coreutils Version: 5.97-5.4 Severity: wishlist File: /bin/cp I don't think this is a bug, but I don't understand why only one (rather than both or none) of the following cp invocations fail: $ cd `mktemp -d` $ touch x $ cp -bf x x $ ls x x.~1~ $ cp -bf x ./ c