Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-11-05 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mo, 05 Nov 2007, taco hoekwater wrote: > I will do a tl checkin immediately after release. Is it good enough if > I send you the versio number, or do you need a diff/patch file? svn change number is perfect. Big thanks, especially for your work. When I have settled down a bit with all the caos

Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-11-05 Thread taco hoekwater
Norbert Preining wrote: On Mo, 05 Nov 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote: This bug will be fixed in MetPost 1.001 (to be released this week) Thanks, great. BTW: Can you provide (by any chance) a diff from 1.000, or even better, a diff from current texlive sources ;-) I will do a tl checkin immedia

Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-11-05 Thread Norbert Preining
On Mo, 05 Nov 2007, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > This bug will be fixed in MetPost 1.001 (to be released this week) Thanks, great. BTW: Can you provide (by any chance) a diff from 1.000, or even better, a diff from current texlive sources ;-) Best wishes Norbert ---

Bug#446617: (fwd) Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-11-05 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Braun Gábor wrote: (Please leave [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Cc) We got a bug report on Debian which still uses mpost as present in TeX Live 2007 (ie) 0.993. See below for the bug description and a test file. Is this fixed by MetaPost 1.00, or is this something new? Works for me (MetaPost 1.000).

Bug#446617: (fwd) Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-10-29 Thread Braun Gábor
> > (Please leave [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Cc) > > > > We got a bug report on Debian which still uses mpost as present in TeX > > Live 2007 (ie) 0.993. See below for the bug description and a test file. > > > > Is this fixed by MetaPost 1.00, or is this something new? > > Works for me (MetaPost 1.000).

Bug#446617: (fwd) Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-10-23 Thread Taco Hoekwater
Norbert Preining wrote: forwarded 446617 [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks Dear Taco! Dear all! (Please leave [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Cc) We got a bug report on Debian which still uses mpost as present in TeX Live 2007 (ie) 0.993. See below for the bug description and a test file. Is this fixed by Meta

Bug#446617: (fwd) Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-10-23 Thread Norbert Preining
something new? Thanks a lot and all the best Norbert - Forwarded message from Gábor Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - > From: Gábor Braun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output > To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PR

Bug#446617: texlive-metapost: Omits font encoding from output

2007-10-14 Thread Gábor Braun
Package: texlive-metapost Version: 2007-14 Severity: normal Hi, When I run metapost with the command mpost test2.mp where test2.mp is the minimal input file. It produces two output files: test2.1 and test2.2. I can view the first one in gv but not the second one. The second one reports the e