On 10/24/07, Javier Serrano Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could easily fix the compilation, but I'm worried about runtime on
> 64 bit archs.
Yes. True.
> These are the options:
> - Cleaning up the code. We need upstream cooperation.
> - Restrict festival to 32 bit archs.
I am packaging n
El dc 24 de 10 del 2007 a les 10:13 +0530, en/na Kartik Mistry va
escriure:
> I am working 'hard' on latest release. I know its too late but latest
> speech-tools has some problem with building.
You're having problems on amd64, aren't you? Yet another package
depending on ia32-libs ("Pointers will
On 10/24/07, Javier Serrano Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What could be best option?
>
> ...
> I would leave this bug alone till we have a more recent festival version
> (no need to hurry :). I guess it won't be fixed because the affected
> subsystem hasn't changed, but it'll be easier for up
El dt 23 de 10 del 2007 a les 13:11 +0530, en/na Kartik Mistry va
escriure:
> What could be best option?
It should be compiled with -fPIC. You could add a little dirty patch to
do so. The proper fix is to deal with speech-tools configuration system.
This may mean some work.
There's no benefit how
On 10/23/07, Javier Serrano Polo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: festival
> Version: 1.4.3-22
> Severity: minor
>
> festival is being compiled without -fPIC since 1.4.3-18. This won't
> allow compilation of shared libraries at least on amd64. The linker will
> complain about relocating symbol
Package: festival
Version: 1.4.3-22
Severity: minor
festival is being compiled without -fPIC since 1.4.3-18. This won't
allow compilation of shared libraries at least on amd64. The linker will
complain about relocating symbols.
A shared library compiled with this flag will be mostly unusable
never
6 matches
Mail list logo
