Hi,
On Sunday 04 May 2008 19:12, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > This was interpreted by at least one person that the license needs to
> > > pushed in the same directory on the mirror than the package.
> > And because there is one person interpreting this differently than the
> > licencing party itself
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 06:06:53PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sunday 04 May 2008 17:23, Waldi wrote:
> > | Your rights to redistribute the Software shall be contingent upon your
> > | installation of this Agreement in its entirety in the same directory as
> > | the Software.
> > This was inte
Bastian Blank wrote:
>
> | Your rights to redistribute the Software shall be contingent upon your
> | installation of this Agreement in its entirety in the same directory as
> | the Software.
>
> This was interpreted by at least one person that the license needs to
> pushed in the same directory
Hi,
On Sunday 04 May 2008 17:23, Waldi wrote:
> | Your rights to redistribute the Software shall be contingent upon your
> | installation of this Agreement in its entirety in the same directory as
> | the Software.
> This was interpreted by at least one person that the license needs to
> pushed in
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Saturday 03 May 2008 23:57, Per Olofsson wrote:
> > Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > We decided that we can't ship it with this license in non-free.
> Where did you document this decission? On what is it based?
| Your rights to redistri
Hi,
On Saturday 03 May 2008 23:57, Per Olofsson wrote:
> Bastian Blank wrote:
> > We decided that we can't ship it with this license in non-free.
Where did you document this decission? On what is it based?
> But if you have already decided that the firmware can't be packaged, I
> guess this bug
Hi,
Bastian Blank wrote:
>> 2.) In addition to the firmware for the ipw2200 mentioned by the original
>> submitter, there is also the other legacy ipw2100
>> http://ipw2100.sourceforge.net/
>> (I didn't look at the license though)
>
> We decided that we can't ship it with this license in non-f
On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 01:11:32AM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote:
> 1.) The Intel 3945 adapter was previously supported by the ipw3945 driver
> http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/
Was dropped because not longer supported by current kernels.
> but that was deprecated starting with 2.6.24, and replaced w
I also would like to see the various Intel wireless firmware in the
firmware-nonfree package.
1.) The Intel 3945 adapter was previously supported by the ipw3945 driver
http://ipw3945.sourceforge.net/
but that was deprecated starting with 2.6.24, and replaced with the new
Intel Wireless WiFi L
9 matches
Mail list logo
