* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081104 05:36]:
This bug isn't assigned to the tech ctte, but I'm going to go ahead and
weigh in anyway since the thread is still in my mailbox demanding a
response. :)
Anyway, the release team has now made their decision here, so it would again
be in
This bug isn't assigned to the tech ctte, but I'm going to go ahead and
weigh in anyway since the thread is still in my mailbox demanding a
response. :)
Anyway, the release team has now made their decision here, so it would again
be in order to assign this to the TC if the submitter wishes to
# please read it till the end before flame!
# speaking with my TC hat on
severity 449497 important
thanks
* Steffen Joeris ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081031 14:31]:
Dear Technical Committee Members
Currently, there is a dispute about a certain part of the foo2zjs package.
Unfortunately, we do not
reassgin 449497 tech-ctte,foo2zjs
thanks
Dear Technical Committee Members
Currently, there is a dispute about a certain part of the foo2zjs package.
Unfortunately, we do not seem to be able to solve it and thus require your
assistance. We have tried to get a paragraph together to state the
Note: I'm not a CTTE member.
Steffen Joeris wrote:
Maintainer:
--
The problem is as follows. The submitter sees the inclusion of the
getweb script as a violation of the DFSG. The script is provided by
upstream to download non-free firmware from his upstream webpage. The
package
5 matches
Mail list logo
