Bug#341701: Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

Bill Allombert writes: Hi, Please try the script in the bug #462648: it report a failure if I apply the patch... I did some research and it turned out that the patch I sent you yesterday accidentally fixes the problem ;) Without the patch the 'dpkg-query | sed' pipe always fails when

Bug#341701: Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

Bill Allombert writes: Hi, Well, I applied the following patch (w.r.t the CVS version) and this breaks menu auto-update feature. This is very strange. What do you mean by this? I got the current CVS version, built it and installed and everything seemed to work OK. BTW. I've discovered

Bug#341701: Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:45:26PM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote: Bill Allombert writes: Hi, Well, I applied the following patch (w.r.t the CVS version) and this breaks menu auto-update feature. This is very strange. What do you mean by this? I got the current CVS version, built it

Bug#341701: Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 11:26:40AM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote: tags 341701 patch thanks Bill Allombert writes: Hi, Thanks a lot, it seems fine. By any chance do you have an idea how to fix bug #341701 ? The problem is the standard shell returns exit status of the last command

Bug#341701: Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

tags 341701 patch thanks Bill Allombert writes: Hi, Thanks a lot, it seems fine. By any chance do you have an idea how to fix bug #341701 ? The problem is the standard shell returns exit status of the last command as the status of pipe. You can obey this either by avoiding the pipe

Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

tags 452801 patch quit Bill Allombert writes: update-menus is not documented as handling virtual package. I have no idea how to implement that See attached patch ;) or even if it is a good idea I'm not sure too. However at least one package (gvim) would benefit from it. The situation

Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 10:13:41PM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote: tags 452801 patch quit Bill Allombert writes: update-menus is not documented as handling virtual package. I have no idea how to implement that See attached patch ;) Thanks a lot, it seems fine. By any chance do you have

Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

severity 452801 wishlist quit On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 11:11:43AM +0100, Robert Luberda wrote: Package: menu Version: 2.1.36 Severity: normal Hi, update-menus -v displays the following warnings: update-menus[4398]: Reading menu-entry files in /usr/share/menu/. update-menus[4398]: file

Bug#452801: menu: Does not consider virtual packages as installed

Package: menu Version: 2.1.36 Severity: normal Hi, update-menus -v displays the following warnings: update-menus[4398]: Reading menu-entry files in /usr/share/menu/. update-menus[4398]: file /usr/share/menu/alsaplayer-daemon line 8: Discarding entry requiring missing package