Hi,
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 03:37, David Nusinow wrote:
I've added a conflicts to the intel driver package, so this bug will close
with the next upload of the driver. Thanks for letting us know.
Thanks.
regards,
Holger
pgpPaYBnz9RXj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Dec 3, 2007 at 21:37:07 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:01:43PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 30 November 2007 13:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
I don't understand what conflicting with xorg would achieve. IMO
915resolution should just be
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 04:51:32PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Dec 3, 2007 at 21:37:07 -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:01:43PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 30 November 2007 13:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
I don't understand what
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 04:01:43PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 30 November 2007 13:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
I don't understand what conflicting with xorg would achieve. IMO
915resolution should just be removed.
right. So it's the other way round: xorg could conflict with
On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 11:26:38 am Holger Levsen wrote:
package: 915resolution
version: 0.5.3-1
h01ger white, i dont think the proper fix for #420283 is to just update
the description. IMO you should add a versioned conflict on xorg
Filing a new bug as 420283 is archived.
Well, I am not sure,
Hi,
On Friday 30 November 2007 13:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
I don't understand what conflicting with xorg would achieve. IMO
915resolution should just be removed.
right. So it's the other way round: xorg could conflict with it, so that users
will notice. And 915resolution can be removed from
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 14:11:36 +0100, Steffen Joeris wrote:
Hi Julien
Maybe the X strike force knows for sure, cc:ing them so they can comment.
I don't understand what conflicting with xorg would achieve. IMO
915resolution should just be removed.
I am lacking a test machine at the
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 13:13:06 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Friday 30 November 2007 09:27, you wrote:
Well, I am not sure, if the new xorg supports all the chipsets and works
out of the box. Did you check that by any chance?
If you are not sure, why do you declare it
Hi,
On Friday 30 November 2007 09:27, you wrote:
Well, I am not sure, if the new xorg supports all the chipsets and works
out of the box. Did you check that by any chance?
If you are not sure, why do you declare it (unconditionally) obsolete in the
description? ;-)
I didn't check, I just
Hi Julien
Maybe the X strike force knows for sure, cc:ing them so they can comment.
I don't understand what conflicting with xorg would achieve. IMO
915resolution should just be removed.
I am lacking a test machine at the moment. Can you confirm that the new xorg
has all the functionality
package: 915resolution
version: 0.5.3-1
h01ger white, i dont think the proper fix for #420283 is to just update
the description. IMO you should add a versioned conflict on xorg
Filing a new bug as 420283 is archived.
regards,
Holger
pgpcNQeOIXU3G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
11 matches
Mail list logo
