On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 05:20:09PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 21:13 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> >
> > If you file a bug, please let me know the bug number so I can track it
> > too! I'll keep this bug open of course until libraw1394 has support for
> > the Juju stack.
On Mon, 2007-12-10 at 21:13 +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
>
> If you file a bug, please let me know the bug number so I can track it
> too! I'll keep this bug open of course until libraw1394 has support for
> the Juju stack.
The bug already exists, see bug #436267 :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 06:25:41PM +0100, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> >> We now have in testing the 2.6.22 kernel which has the old ieee1394
> >> stack removed and now uses the new Juju firewire stack. We need the
> >
> >Removed? The 2.6.22 kernel still has the old stack, and in addition you
> >ca
>> We now have in testing the 2.6.22 kernel which has the old ieee1394
>> stack removed and now uses the new Juju firewire stack. We need the
>
>Removed? The 2.6.22 kernel still has the old stack, and in addition you
>can select the Juju stack, which is marked experimental.
But the choice mad
tags 453358 + wishlist
tags 453358 + upstream
thanks
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 01:06:50PM +1300, Daniel Reurich wrote:
> Package: libraw1394-8
> Version: 1.3.0-2
> Severity: important
>
> We now have in testing the 2.6.22 kernel which has the old ieee1394
> stack removed and now uses the new Juju
Package: libraw1394-8
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: important
We now have in testing the 2.6.22 kernel which has the old ieee1394
stack removed and now uses the new Juju firewire stack. We need the
juju patches applied to libraw1394 in order to be able to make use
of this new stack with our fire
6 matches
Mail list logo
