Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007, Julien Cristau wrote:
Or we can change type-handling too. Apparently xorg only uses the fact
that type-handling provides not+sparc but it doesn't use the type-handling
program which is the real user of dpkg-architecture. Is that right?
Yes,
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007, Julien Cristau wrote:
Or we can change type-handling too. Apparently xorg only uses the fact
that type-handling provides not+sparc but it doesn't use the type-handling
program which is the real user of dpkg-architecture. Is that right?
Yes, that's correct.
Maybe
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 20:02:34 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
On Wed, 05 Dec 2007, Julien Cristau wrote:
Maybe type-handling could be split with an empty package whose sole
purpose is to Provides some virtual packages while type-handling
stays the
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:42:17PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you move dpkg-architecture from dpkg-dev to dpkg ? It seems
that
because of this, it turns out that having the xorg
On Wed, Dec 5, 2007 at 00:14:53 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Or we can change type-handling too. Apparently xorg only uses the fact
that type-handling provides not+sparc but it doesn't use the type-handling
program which is the real user of dpkg-architecture. Is that right?
Yes, that's
Package: dpkg-dev
Version: 1.13.25
Severity: normal
Please could you move dpkg-architecture from dpkg-dev to dpkg ? It seems that
because of this, it turns out that having the xorg meta-package installed
requires dpkg-dev and hence binutils (because of type-handling).
-- System Information:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you move dpkg-architecture from dpkg-dev to dpkg ? It seems that
because of this, it turns out that having the xorg meta-package installed
requires dpkg-dev and hence binutils (because of type-handling).
dpkg-architecture is perl and the
On Sun, Dec 02, 2007 at 09:42:17PM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Sun, 02 Dec 2007, Robert Millan wrote:
Please could you move dpkg-architecture from dpkg-dev to dpkg ? It seems
that
because of this, it turns out that having the xorg meta-package installed
requires dpkg-dev and hence
8 matches
Mail list logo