Hi Colin,
* Colin Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-05 14:57]:
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:35:03 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
And to be honest, I am not going to contact any of you guys if I find
some bug again, simple because you showed that you are not able to
handle this just because of some bad
Hi Ricardo,
* Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-05 13:15]:
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:58:26 +0100
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Colin Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-04 13:05]:
This bug is going to be fixed.
Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:35:03 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
Hi,
And to be honest, I am not going to contact any of you guys if I find
some bug again, simple because you showed that you are not able to
handle this just because of some bad press.
Dude, it's not about bad press. It's about following
This bug is going to be fixed.
Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues
privately until they're resolved, or is it more interesting to have
them published all over the place[*] when no solution is available?
[*]
http://secwatch.org/advisories/1019661/
Hi Colin,
* Colin Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-04 13:05]:
This bug is going to be fixed.
Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues
privately until they're resolved, or is it more interesting to have
them published all over the place[*] when no solution is
Hi Nico,
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:58:26 +0100
Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Colin,
* Colin Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-04 13:05]:
This bug is going to be fixed.
Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues
privately until they're resolved, or is
6 matches
Mail list logo