Bug#454089: Resolution

2007-12-05 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Colin, * Colin Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-05 14:57]: On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:35:03 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: And to be honest, I am not going to contact any of you guys if I find some bug again, simple because you showed that you are not able to handle this just because of some bad

Bug#454089: Resolution

2007-12-05 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Ricardo, * Ricardo Mones [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-05 13:15]: On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:58:26 +0100 Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Colin Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-04 13:05]: This bug is going to be fixed. Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security

Bug#454089: Resolution

2007-12-05 Thread Colin Leroy
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:35:03 +0100, Nico Golde wrote: Hi, And to be honest, I am not going to contact any of you guys if I find some bug again, simple because you showed that you are not able to handle this just because of some bad press. Dude, it's not about bad press. It's about following

Bug#454089: Resolution

2007-12-04 Thread Colin Leroy
This bug is going to be fixed. Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues privately until they're resolved, or is it more interesting to have them published all over the place[*] when no solution is available? [*] http://secwatch.org/advisories/1019661/

Bug#454089: Resolution

2007-12-04 Thread Nico Golde
Hi Colin, * Colin Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-04 13:05]: This bug is going to be fixed. Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues privately until they're resolved, or is it more interesting to have them published all over the place[*] when no solution is

Bug#454089: Resolution

2007-12-04 Thread Ricardo Mones
Hi Nico, On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:58:26 +0100 Nico Golde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Colin, * Colin Leroy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-12-04 13:05]: This bug is going to be fixed. Would it be too much to ask the submitter to handle security issues privately until they're resolved, or is