Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-02-01 Thread Tore Anderson
* Matthias Schmitz Since this is my first maintainership it is a good idea to have some more experienced co-maintainers. And if linpro has nothing against it i will keep the code in the upstream svn. Nothing against that at all, in fact I see it as a big advantage. Much easier to branch and

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-31 Thread Matthias Schmitz
Hi all! Tore Anderson wrote: glad there's finally some interest in taking over the package from me. I think there's at least a year since I've had any free time and motivation to work on Debian packaging, so it's about high time somebody takes care of it again... Matthias Schmitz was the first

Bug#456640: Bug#455564: Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-31 Thread Jose Carlos Medeiros
Hi, Package most things from http://muninexchange.projects.linpro.no, and other sources? I think yes. Sometimes we need plugins that arent in munin. -- []'s José Carlos

Bug#455564: Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-31 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Thursday 31 January 2008 23:05, you wrote: Package most things from http://muninexchange.projects.linpro.no, and other sources? I think yes. Sometimes we need plugins that arent in munin. I think so too and suggest to build the munin-plugins-contrib package per default and sticks

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-31 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Thursday 31 January 2008 20:11, Matthias Schmitz wrote: I am under the impression that their work will likely result in a new upstream release (1.2.6) as well as new Debian packages. This looks like my plan :-) - merge all the candidate changesets from 1.3 and then look which

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-31 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Matthias Schmitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] merge all the candidate changesets from 1.3 and then look which debian bugs still unfixed. That sounds like a good plan. (And if there is time left after this - bring a 1.3 deb in experimental.) May work. As far as I know, the plans for new

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-28 Thread Tore Anderson
* Holger Levsen today I stumbled upon #403341, which has a very simple fix. There are quite some similar bugs (simple, with patch) in the debian BTS which I would like to help fixing, as I use munin heavily for work, in Debian Edu and privatly. So I like to request access to the upstream

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Tore, On Monday 28 January 2008 09:35, you wrote: Matthias Schmitz was the first one to contact me about taking over the package, and he's been actively following up on that by taking on lots of outstanding work on the 1.2.x branch. My colleague Stig Sandbeck Mathisen has also been trying

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-28 Thread Tore Anderson
* Holger Levsen Cool. Currently I'm actually mostly interested in bringing 1.2.x in (even better) shape, as this is what I use. But then, I'm happy to switch to 1.3 if upstream thinks it's ready. (Which I dont believe it is, considering it's not even in experimental.) 1.2.6 will be part of

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, On Monday 28 January 2008 11:46, you wrote: 1.2.6 will be part of 1.2.x. ;-) Hehe. So what's the status of 1.3.x? Is this OFTC or freenode or really another irc network? Neither, it's just our (Linpro's) stand-alone interal IRC server. Maybe it's time to move the channel elsewhere

Bug#455564: Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-28 Thread Jose Carlos Medeiros
Hi, All Holger, about 'munin-plugins-contrib' its a good idea. As munin user I would like something like that. Well, I think you will be a better maintanership, because from now Im a bit busy :( Then, you can take this ITA to you. Regards Jose Carlos 2008/1/28, Holger Levsen [EMAIL

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-28 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Holger Levsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So what's the status of 1.3.x? 1.3.x is a development branch, which will result in the release of a stable version from 1.4.x. 1.4.x should be packaged after 1.2.x. It's the same odd and even number versioning as the Linux kernel used to separate from

Bug#455564: Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-28 Thread Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
Jose Carlos Medeiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Holger, about 'munin-plugins-contrib' its a good idea. As munin user I would like something like that. Package most things from http://muninexchange.projects.linpro.no, and other sources? Well, I think you will be a better maintanership,

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-27 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, today I stumbled upon #403341, which has a very simple fix. There are quite some similar bugs (simple, with patch) in the debian BTS which I would like to help fixing, as I use munin heavily for work, in Debian Edu and privatly. So I like to request access to the upstream SVN, as this is

Bug#456640: munin comaintaince

2008-01-27 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
Heya, So I like to request access to the upstream SVN, as this is where the debian packaging is kept, AIUI. Jose (as new owner of this bug), what do you think? I cc:ed Bernd, as we spoke about team maintaining munin in December last year.. Seconded. I'd be happy to maintain the munin