Alessandro De Zorzi wrote:
> phamm-vacation.schema are a schema compatible to granwl, I suppose
> that a dfsg version gnarwl with a dependency to phamm-ldap-vacation could=
>
> solve the problem: packages.debian.org/unstable/phamm-ldap-vacation
> but phamm already removed from testing yet!
As pha
phamm-vacation.schema are a schema compatible to granwl, I suppose
that a dfsg version gnarwl with a dependency to phamm-ldap-vacation could=
solve the problem: packages.debian.org/unstable/phamm-ldap-vacation
but phamm already removed from testing yet!
Anyway Is possible migrate granwl in non-fr
Cajus Pollmeier wrote:
> I'm not able to provide tested gnarwl packages anymore. Sorry. I'm fine
> with getting it removed from lenny.
removal hint added.
Cheers
Luk
> Am 31.08.2008 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Viehmann:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> gnarwl has an RC bug (#457279) about non-DFSG files (open for 8
I'm not able to provide tested gnarwl packages anymore. Sorry. I'm
fine with getting it removed from lenny.
Cheers,
Cajus
Am 31.08.2008 um 19:07 schrieb Thomas Viehmann:
Hi,
gnarwl has an RC bug (#457279) about non-DFSG files (open for 8
months,
set to serious for >=1 month). gnarwl seems
Hi,
gnarwl has an RC bug (#457279) about non-DFSG files (open for 8 months,
set to serious for >=1 month). gnarwl seems to seriously lack maintainer
attention: #334873 is a segfault bug almost three years old without
maintainer response. The last maintainer upload was more than three
years ago, i.
5 matches
Mail list logo