On 22-Dec-07, 11:48 (CST), Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is what I feel about it: ITP should be filled the moment you'd
> like to package a piece of software, so you're not supposed to know it
> in deep; thus, the long description (that describes what the package
> does) can be rew
* Julien Cristau [Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:41:37 +0100]:
> Why not use the same name for both? I think it'd be clearer, and
> has no drawbacks afaics.
+1. I personally dislike so many python modules "suffering" from this.
Cheers,
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 05:42:20PM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> * Package name: extended_threading
> Description : Extension of the python threading api
Shouldn't the package name be something like python-extendable-threading
then? i.e. have python- in it? Also you're not allowed _s.
S
> > the binary package will have the python- prefix, but that is the
> > intended source package name
> >
> Why not use the same name for both? I think it'd be clearer, and
> has no drawbacks afaics.
On Debian Python Modules Team requested me not to change source
package name from upstream name i
Hi Steve,
> I've seen this a several times lately (both explicitly, as here, and
> in response to suggestions), and I'd like to speak against it: One of
> key points of the ITP is to allow others to correct and/or improve the
> descriptions before initial package upload and before others waste tim
On 22-Dec-07, 10:42 (CST), Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Description : Extension of the python threading api
>
> (will be rewritten in the real package)
I've seen this a several times lately (both explicitly, as here, and
in response to suggestions), and I'd like to speak agains
On Sat, Dec 22, 2007 at 18:36:16 +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> > Shouldn't the package name be something like python-extendable-threading
> > then? i.e. have python- in it?
>
> the binary package will have the python- prefix, but that is the
> intended source package name
>
Why not use the same n
> Shouldn't the package name be something like python-extendable-threading
> then? i.e. have python- in it?
the binary package will have the python- prefix, but that is the
intended source package name
> Also you're not allowed _s.
good catch, I'll call it extended-threading (source) and
pytho
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: extended_threading
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : S James S Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL :
* http://www.var-dev.net/programming/python/extended_threading
* License :
9 matches
Mail list logo
