On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 01:23:03PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> It is really a backdoor to enable things that are not handled by full
> Debian packages. But being unhandled means that the local user admin
> really needs to manage the problem themselves.
Well, I think that if we have a facility to de
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > If you're saying that the package is not responsible in any way
> > > for what happens next, then I'd say that the package has
> > > literally led the user into a trap there, and we've descended so
> > > much below the quality standard of 2008, it may ev
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:06:13PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > If you're saying that the package is not responsible in any way for what
> > happens next, then I'd say that the package has literally led the user into
> > a trap there, and we've descended so much below the quality standard of
> > 20
Josip Rodin wrote:
> Ondøej Surý wrote:
> > Josip Rodin wrote:
> > > I disagree on the wish part - the whole purpose of the pear package is to
> > > get those external PEAR packages. If pear is used to put those files on
> > > users' systems, it also has the responsibility to take care of them on
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:08:40PM +0200, Ondøej Surý wrote:
> > I disagree on the wish part - the whole purpose of the pear package is to
> > get those external PEAR packages. If pear is used to put those files on
> > users' systems, it also has the responsibility to take care of them once
> > t
tags 458436 +wontfix
severity 458436 wishlist
thank you
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 23:00, Josip Rodin wrote:
> severity 458436 normal
> thanks
>
> Hi,
>
>> severity 458436 wishlist
>> thanks
>>
>> Since the PEAR packages provided by de Debian package are
>> updated/upgraded this is not a bug but a f
6 matches
Mail list logo
