Faidon,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 10:10:32PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> Kilian Krause wrote:
> >>In the case that it is, how would you feel about making the sample
> >>build/run conditional on the presence of libpt in the build system?
> >
> >Well, it was very much needed as a precaution in t
Kilian Krause wrote:
In the case that it is, how would you feel about making the sample
build/run conditional on the presence of libpt in the build system?
Well, it was very much needed as a precaution in the past - especially on
the non-trivial architectures. Doing a conditional test without e
Faidon,
On Thu, Apr 03, 2008 at 07:29:59PM +0300, Faidon Liambotis wrote:
> [the following is a more useful description of the bug than the irc log]
>
> pwlib and pwlib-titan build-conflict with their runtime parts besides
> the -dev parts.
> I think this is being done because a sample program i
[the following is a more useful description of the bug than the irc log]
pwlib and pwlib-titan build-conflict with their runtime parts besides
the -dev parts.
I think this is being done because a sample program is built and run
when the package builds as a mean to catch runtime errors/screwups
Package: libpt-dev
Severity: normal
10:04 * nyu grumbles at libpt-dev and its Build-Conflict with itself forcing
him to uninstall ekiga
10:08 < moray> Build-Conflicting with yourself sounds like a wrong way to fix a
bug
10:19 < paravoid> nyu: afaik there was no other way
10:19 < paravoid> I'm i
5 matches
Mail list logo
