On 11263 March 1977, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
>> Do you think we should drop it completely or just reduce it to info?
> Reducing it to info is probably good.
Keep it at warning and the situation will change over time and packages
get that header.
--
bye Joerg
[GFDL]
Well, Debian is not for n
[Russ Allbery]
> Do you think we should drop it completely or just reduce it to info?
Reducing it to info is probably good.
> I think having a description is rather nice and may help figure out
> where an init script abandoned by some previous package came from
> without having to do as much rese
Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: lintian
> Version: 1.23.41
>
> Now that the LSB headers in init.d scripts is more used, it has become
> obvious that the lintian warning about missing short-description is
> not needed. As far as I know, there is nothing using this header
Package: lintian
Version: 1.23.41
Now that the LSB headers in init.d scripts is more used, it has become
obvious that the lintian warning about missing short-description is
not needed. As far as I know, there is nothing using this header, and
quite a lot of scripts are missing it. It is only ni
4 matches
Mail list logo