Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > Anyway, this is the show-stopper. Contaminates other software. DFSG 9.
> > It's the parts of FPL sections 1, 2 and 5 about Scripts. Clear enough?
> >
> Yes, your position is now clear, thanks.
>
> Yet, I can't see why you say
MJ Ray wrote:
> Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis:
>
>> MJ Ray wrote: [...]
>>
>>> In general, I'm disappointed to see this licence proliferation.
>>>
>> I am too.
>>
>> There isn't any single open source mainstream programming language or
>> even compiler I know, includ
Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis:
> MJ Ray wrote: [...]
> > In general, I'm disappointed to see this licence proliferation.
> I am too.
>
> There isn't any single open source mainstream programming language or
> even compiler I know, including clisp, gcc, PHP, python, swi-prolog,
> r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MJ Ray wrote:
> Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
>> The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra
>> clarifications and permissions. [...]
>
> Summary: I believe that any interpreter under this Falcon P.L.
> licence will conta
Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...]
> The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra clarifications
> and permissions. [...]
Summary: I believe that any interpreter under this Falcon P.L. licence
will contaminate other software and so fail DFSG 9. Also, I think the
licence c
5 matches
Mail list logo