Bug#460591: Falcon P.L. license (ITP:Bug#460591)

2008-04-07 Thread MJ Ray
Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MJ Ray wrote: > > Anyway, this is the show-stopper. Contaminates other software. DFSG 9. > > It's the parts of FPL sections 1, 2 and 5 about Scripts. Clear enough? > > > Yes, your position is now clear, thanks. > > Yet, I can't see why you say

Bug#460591: Falcon P.L. license (ITP:Bug#460591)

2008-04-01 Thread Giancarlo Niccolai
MJ Ray wrote: > Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis: > >> MJ Ray wrote: [...] >> >>> In general, I'm disappointed to see this licence proliferation. >>> >> I am too. >> >> There isn't any single open source mainstream programming language or >> even compiler I know, includ

Bug#460591: Falcon P.L. license (ITP:Bug#460591)

2008-04-01 Thread MJ Ray
Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skribis: > MJ Ray wrote: [...] > > In general, I'm disappointed to see this licence proliferation. > I am too. > > There isn't any single open source mainstream programming language or > even compiler I know, including clisp, gcc, PHP, python, swi-prolog, > r

Bug#460591: Falcon P.L. license (ITP:Bug#460591)

2008-03-25 Thread Giancarlo Niccolai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MJ Ray wrote: > Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra >> clarifications and permissions. [...] > > Summary: I believe that any interpreter under this Falcon P.L. > licence will conta

Bug#460591: Falcon P.L. license (ITP:Bug#460591)

2008-03-25 Thread MJ Ray
Giancarlo Niccolai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > The license is tightly based on Apache 2, with extra clarifications > and permissions. [...] Summary: I believe that any interpreter under this Falcon P.L. licence will contaminate other software and so fail DFSG 9. Also, I think the licence c