On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
Yes, that's a reasonable plan. I eliminated all my initialization code, but
the segv still occurs on startup. The next step would be to start removing
other,
non-initializing code and declarations.
Could you push this to a publicly avialable
On Apr 23, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
I wonder whether it might be a good idea to spend all effort on wx2.8
exclusively given the fact that wx2.6 is outdated as well.
That might be reasonable. They're are many changes between wx2.6 and
wx2.8 in
terms of eliminating compiler
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Kevin Rosenberg wrote:
1) It's stored in a local git repository. I've made local git branches
for porting to wx2.6 and wx2.8
I wonder whether it might be a good idea to spend all effort on wx2.8
exclusively given the fact that wx2.6 is outdated as well.
with the main
The current status of CTSim is:
1) It's stored in a local git repository. I've made local git branches
for porting to wx2.6 and wx2.8
with the main changes being conversions of all strings to Unicode. The
source compiles
without warnings, but segfaults during GTK font initialization. I've
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
What's the status of the port of ctsim to a more recent wxwindows?
GTK 1.2 is scheduled for removal (and wx2.4 along with it)
Kevin, IMHO it would be a good idea if you would keep the Debian Med
list informed about the current state of ctsim.
Package: ctsim
Version: 4.5.5-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
This is a heads up bug that we are attempting to get wxwindows2.4
removed from the archive (Hence the serious severity). I know we have
spoken in the past you aren't particularly interested in transitioning
to wx2.6 but hopefully we
6 matches
Mail list logo