Bug#462189: wxwindows2.4 is scheduled to be removed

2009-04-27 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Kevin Rosenberg wrote: Yes, that's a reasonable plan. I eliminated all my initialization code, but the segv still occurs on startup. The next step would be to start removing other, non-initializing code and declarations. Could you push this to a publicly avialable

Bug#462189: wxwindows2.4 is scheduled to be removed

2009-04-26 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
On Apr 23, 2009, at 12:53 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: I wonder whether it might be a good idea to spend all effort on wx2.8 exclusively given the fact that wx2.6 is outdated as well. That might be reasonable. They're are many changes between wx2.6 and wx2.8 in terms of eliminating compiler

Bug#462189: wxwindows2.4 is scheduled to be removed

2009-04-23 Thread Andreas Tille
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009, Kevin Rosenberg wrote: 1) It's stored in a local git repository. I've made local git branches for porting to wx2.6 and wx2.8 I wonder whether it might be a good idea to spend all effort on wx2.8 exclusively given the fact that wx2.6 is outdated as well. with the main

Bug#462189: wxwindows2.4 is scheduled to be removed

2009-04-22 Thread Kevin Rosenberg
The current status of CTSim is: 1) It's stored in a local git repository. I've made local git branches for porting to wx2.6 and wx2.8 with the main changes being conversions of all strings to Unicode. The source compiles without warnings, but segfaults during GTK font initialization. I've

Bug#462189: wxwindows2.4 is scheduled to be removed

2009-04-20 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: What's the status of the port of ctsim to a more recent wxwindows? GTK 1.2 is scheduled for removal (and wx2.4 along with it) Kevin, IMHO it would be a good idea if you would keep the Debian Med list informed about the current state of ctsim.

Bug#462189: wxwindows2.4 is scheduled to be removed

2008-01-22 Thread Barry deFreese
Package: ctsim Version: 4.5.5-1 Severity: serious Hi, This is a heads up bug that we are attempting to get wxwindows2.4 removed from the archive (Hence the serious severity). I know we have spoken in the past you aren't particularly interested in transitioning to wx2.6 but hopefully we