[Petter Reinholdtsen]
These are the latest numbers:
I just ran this:
(cd /org/popcon.debian.org/popcon-mail/all-popcon-results;for f in \
popcon-2008-03-*.gz popcon-2008-04-*.gz; do echo -n $f: ; \
zcat $f | egrep 'Submi|Release: (1.44|1.41|1.42|1.43) '; done)
popcon-2008-03-01.gz:
[Bill Allombert]
The number of stable subscription has been raising again before we
change unstable.
This is true, and I can not explain it.
The number of machine running unstable is so small that it cannot do
a difference.
I believe this is false. As almost all machines in a given time
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
The current result (to early to conclude, I belive) is
These are the latest numbers:
popcon-2008-03-01.gz: Submissions:76046
popcon-2008-03-02.gz: Submissions:76043
popcon-2008-03-03.gz: Submissions:76122
popcon-2008-03-04.gz: Submissions:76136
Hi,
On Thursday 20 March 2008 00:11, you wrote:
Must admit I am surprised to see some decrease already, with 77
machines upgraded to version 1.44 in unstable, and down 21
submissions.
I must say I'm not surprised. We basically *know* (*) this is because the
clients are DOSing the server at
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 07:36:09PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 20 March 2008 00:11, you wrote:
Must admit I am surprised to see some decrease already, with 77
machines upgraded to version 1.44 in unstable, and down 21
submissions.
I must say I'm not surprised. We
Hi Bill,
the DOS issue is been going on since 4 months or so, actually #440493 has been
filed in September 2007, so make this 6. And because I havent replied to a
question I cant answer you think it's temporarily?? If I dont reply, why
don't you ask again, like Petter did yesterday?
Also, I
[Holger Levsen]
Can you please close this bug, so that the release team has one bug less to
worry about?
Note that I decided to test the hypothesis of random sleep not
affecting number of submissions by disabling the workaround and see if
the amount of submissions go down, so version 1.44 is
Hi,
On Wednesday 19 March 2008 12:03, you wrote:
Note that I decided to test the hypothesis of random sleep not
affecting number of submissions by disabling the workaround and see if
the amount of submissions go down,
wouldn't it have been better to let this version go to testing and see, if
[Holger Levsen]
wouldn't it have been better to let this version go to testing and
see, if the number of submissions goes up, as suddenly the machines
running testing can submit data? :)
Nope. It would not prove anything, as an increase could come from
several factors. A decrease is a lot
The version of popcon in unstable reports 20%-30% more data than the
one in unstable, due to the following two changes:
http://bugs.debian.org/457432
http://bugs.debian.org/457441
I would *love* to see a new popcon in testing.
Regards //Johan
2008/3/19, Petter Reinholdtsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[Petter Reinholdtsen]
A decrease is a lot harder to explain as anything else than a DOS
issue, so I decided to test if that will happen first.
This is the way I plan to extract the measurements:
ssh popcon.debian.org
(cd /org/popcon.debian.org/popcon-mail/all-popcon-results; \
for f in
11 matches
Mail list logo
