On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 20:12 +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Rainer Gerhards [2009.08.25.1243
> +0200]:
> > not very hard, almost trivial. There would one switch be required for
> > the startup/shutdown message and probably another one for the message
> > that is emitted when rsyslogd
also sprach Rainer Gerhards [2009.08.25.1243 +0200]:
> not very hard, almost trivial. There would one switch be required for
> the startup/shutdown message and probably another one for the message
> that is emitted when rsyslogd is HUPed.
>
> Would that be useful? If so, I'd consider to implement
On Mon, 2009-08-24 at 11:28 -0400, Frédéric Brière wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:08:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> > When I joined logcheck, there was an unwritten policy not to filter
> > startup and shutdown messages. I don't know if that extends to
...
> But yeah, if rsyslog emits th
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:08:18PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> When I joined logcheck, there was an unwritten policy not to filter
> startup and shutdown messages. I don't know if that extends to
I think the idea was that startup/shutdown is an unusual event, which
typically occurs after a hum
Since rsyslog now has its own ruleset, I'm reassigning this bug to it.
(If I'm not mistaken, it can then be closed, but I'll let Michael be the
final judge.)
--
< asuffield> a workstation is anything you can stick on somebodies desk
and con them into using
-- in #deb
martin f krafft writes:
> also sprach Dmitry Semyonov [2009.02.23.1050 +0100]:
>> As I understand, the rationale for not fixing the bug is "we don't have
>> the time to add and update rules for everything". But since Lenny
>> release, rsyslog no longer falls into the "everything" category. It is
also sprach Dmitry Semyonov [2009.02.23.1050 +0100]:
> As I understand, the rationale for not fixing the bug is "we don't
> have the time to add and update rules for everything". But since Lenny
> release, rsyslog no longer falls into the "everything" category. It is
> now the default system logge
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 08:15:24 +1300, martin f krafft wrote:
> logcheck has the policy not to ignore restart messages. Thanks for
> the patch, please understand that I won't be including it.
Quote from README.logcheck-database:
"Unfortunately, we don't have the time to add and update rules for
ever
tags 463793 wontfix
thanks
also sprach aerusso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008.02.04.0239 +1300]:
> In fact, there does not appear to be any consideration
> of rsyslogd's behavior. Attached is a rule to ignore
> restarts.
logcheck has the policy not to ignore restart messages. Thanks for
the patch, ple
Package: logcheck-database
Version: 1.2.63
Severity: normal
--- Please enter the report below this line. ---
In fact, there does not appear to be any consideration
of rsyslogd's behavior. Attached is a rule to ignore
restarts.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux 2.6
10 matches
Mail list logo
