On Tue, 12 Feb 2008, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/0001-x86-do-not-promote-TM3x00-TM5x00-to-i686-class.patch
>
> -hpa
thanks!
hmm no mention of boot crash in description
please also add pointer to bug report
http://bugs.debian.og/464962
on our s
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/hpa/0001-x86-do-not-promote-TM3x00-TM5x00-to-i686-class.patch
-hpa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:42:50PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Okay, the faulting instruction is the following:
c0383360: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%eax)
include/asm-x86/nops.h:
| /* P6 nops */
| /* uses eax dependencies (Intel-recommended choice) */
[...]
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:42:50PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Okay, the faulting instruction is the following:
> c0383360: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%eax)
include/asm-x86/nops.h:
| /* P6 nops */
| /* uses eax dependencies (Intel-recommended choice) */
[...]
| #define P6_NOP4 ".b
Bastian Blank wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:42:50PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
The Crusoe code morphing software apparently doesn't recognize these
"long noops", and (presumably) the rest of the hinting NOOP group. gcc
didn't use to generate them, and Crusoe/Efficeon generally do not
be
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:42:50PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> The Crusoe code morphing software apparently doesn't recognize these
> "long noops", and (presumably) the rest of the hinting NOOP group. gcc
> didn't use to generate them, and Crusoe/Efficeon generally do not
> benefit from code
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Okay, the faulting instruction is the following:
>
> c0383360: 0f 1f 40 00 nopl 0x0(%eax)
>
> The Crusoe code morphing software apparently doesn't recognize these
> "long noops", and (presumably) the rest of the hinting NOOP group. gcc
> didn't use t
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction.
>>>
>>> If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it
>>> would speed things up.
>>
>> cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Are you sure that build matches the bug report?
urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer
2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3
> The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,
> specifically inside the
Thought some more about this, and since this probably means gcc will
generate this for userspace code as well nowadays, tm5800 should
probably be downgraded to a 586-class machine. Hence the Linux policy
of promoting it to a 686-class machine for having CMOV is actually
incorrect, it doesn't h
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Are you sure that build matches the bug report?
urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer
2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3
The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,
spe
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:14:04PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Are you sure that build matches the bug report?
urrgs right sorry, the posted vmlinux is a newer
2.6.24-git22 and not Version: 2.6.24-3
The EIP given falls inside the .data segment of that kernel,
spe
maximilian attems wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction.
If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would
speed things up.
cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_686/vmlinux
~/publi
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 12:32:27PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> INT 6 is #UD, undefined instruction.
>
> If you could send me a copy of your vmlinux file (not bzImage), it would
> speed things up.
cp -l src/linux-2.6-2.6.24/debian/build/build_i386_none_686/vmlinux
~/public_html/
http://ch
maximilian attems wrote:
sure, ack.
so i'll circumvent bugzilla and add the new x86 maintainers
on cc to let them know about the 2.6.24 and 2.6.25-rc1 boot error
on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor.
http://bugs.debian.org/464962
686 config attached.
INT 6 is #UD, undefined
maximilian attems wrote:
> on shiny fujitsu p700 lifebook, with a Crusoe processor.
FWIW, I misremembered the model number. It's a not-so-shiny P2110.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 02:52:54PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > thanks for quick feedback, have prebuild 2.6.25-rc1-git2
> > (they contain the security fix, but don't seem to suspend here)
> > anyway please test for boot
> > -> http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/2.6.25
maximilian attems wrote:
> thanks for quick feedback, have prebuild 2.6.25-rc1-git2
> (they contain the security fix, but don't seem to suspend here)
> anyway please test for boot
> -> http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/2.6.25-rc1-git2/
Still fails the same.
> if those again don't boot please
On Sun, 10 Feb 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> maximilian attems wrote:
> > i haven't yet compiled latest git21 (will do later today), in the
> > menatime i have i386 snapshots of git15, can you try there the -686
> > http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/git15/
> > if upstream fixed this bug inbetween?
maximilian attems wrote:
> i haven't yet compiled latest git21 (will do later today), in the
> menatime i have i386 snapshots of git15, can you try there the -686
> http://charm.itp.tuwien.ac.at/~mattems/git15/
> if upstream fixed this bug inbetween?
Nope, still fails.
--
see shy jo
signature.
On Sat, 09 Feb 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
> As soon as the kernel is booted from grub, before it prints any normal
> messages, it crashes as follows:
>
> BUG: Int 6: CR2
> EDI ESI 1000 EBP 0020 ESP c0373f54
> EBX c03e5140 EDX 000C ECX EAX c03
Package: linux-image-2.6.24-1-686
Version: 2.6.24-3
Severity: important
As soon as the kernel is booted from grub, before it prints any normal
messages, it crashes as follows:
BUG: Int 6: CR2
EDI ESI 1000 EBP 0020 ESP c0373f54
EBX c03e5140 EDX 000C
22 matches
Mail list logo
