Hi,
On Thursday 14 February 2008 22:49, Petter wrote:
I'll do a backport for backports.org soon, so that all etch users
can use readahead-list.
Note that I believe the profiling do not seem to work properly with
the etch kernel.
Why do you believe that? Which kernel options are requiered?
[Holger Levsen]
Why do you believe that? Which kernel options are requiered?
The inotify kernel feature is needed, as far as I know. I believe it
is missing in 2.6.18. My test run on an etch machine gave me a very
short list of files to load, and this made me believe the profile run
on 2.6.18
hi,
On Friday 15 February 2008 10:27, you wrote:
Why do you believe that? Which kernel options are requiered?
The inotify kernel feature is needed, as far as I know.
As told in this bug report, I have it enabled in the 2.6.21 I'm running.
I believe it
is missing in 2.6.18. My test run
[Holger Levsen]
how did you do this test?
I booted with 'profile' once and then with the bootchartd running, and
the boot seemed to read from disk also after readahead had loaded the
files it believed to be needed. I then had a look at the list of
files in /etc/readahead/, and it was quite
Hi,
On Friday 15 February 2008 11:04, you wrote:
I booted with 'profile' once and then with the bootchartd running, and
the boot seemed to read from disk also after readahead had loaded the
files it believed to be needed. I then had a look at the list of
files in /etc/readahead/, and it was
Holger Levsen wrote:
package: readahead
version: 1.20060421.1016-1~bpo+40+1
severity: minor
Hi,
Thanks for packaging readahead!
Please warn in /usr/share/doc/readahead/README.Debian that a boot with the
profile option will take *significantly* longer than a normal boot.
Will be in
[Holger Levsen]
I'd like to remark that buildd time is cheap, while developer/tester time is
not, though :-)
Yeah. :)
BTW.: Is the latest upstream version really from 2006 ?
It seems to be the latest upstream version, but even this one can only be
found on the Gentoo mirrors, not on
Hi,
On Thursday 14 February 2008 18:12, you wrote:
Will be in the next upload. But it won't happen before an other more
important bug has been found. Else, it would just waste the buildds' time.
Thanks.
I'd like to remark that buildd time is cheap, while developer/tester time is
not, though
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Holger Levsen]
I'd like to remark that buildd time is cheap, while developer/tester time is
not, though :-)
Yeah. :)
I just committed the fix for README.Debian to the git repo.
Holger: If I can't reproduce your other bug (#465273), I will make a new
release
[Julian Andres Klode]
I'll do a backport for backports.org soon, so that all etch users
can use readahead-list.
Note that I believe the profiling do not seem to work properly with
the etch kernel.
No work has gone into readahead. readahead will be replaced by
prefetch, another alternative
package: readahead
version: 1.20060421.1016-1~bpo+40+1
severity: minor
Hi,
Thanks for packaging readahead!
Please warn in /usr/share/doc/readahead/README.Debian that a boot with the
profile option will take *significantly* longer than a normal boot.
Mislead by a bogus failure message by
11 matches
Mail list logo
